标题: (OG10-SR-021) [打印本页] 作者: foleygump 时间: 2010-5-31 20:48 标题: (OG10-SR-021) Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A)in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B)if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C)in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D)if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E)in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
这个题目主要考我们什么？ OG的解答:In choices A, C, and E, in attributing ... behavior modifies the perpetrators, producing the illogical statement that the perpetrators rather than the defense attorneys are attributing behavior to food allergies 是什么意思呀？ 作者: flames001 时间: 2010-5-31 23:07
but分句后的主语是 the perpetrators，当然不是随便能修饰的。 in attributing ... behavior 的逻辑主语是perpetors的时候 你觉得合适么？作者: crazyxxx 时间: 2010-6-1 10:36
个人觉得,这道题目,考的知识点 1. 句子结构, ...but..., 在but之后是一句有转折含义的完整句型. 2. 分词做状语的逻辑主语 3. idiom, attribute的用法