ChaseDream

标题: 请教OG12-4 [打印本页]

作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-5-26 21:21
标题: 请教OG12-4
Of all the vast tides of migration thathave swept through history, maybe none is more concentrated as the wavethat brought 12 million immigrants onto  Americanshores in little more than three decades.
(A) maybe none is more concentrated as
(B) it may be that none is moreconcentrated as
(C) perhaps it is none that is moreconcentrated than
(D) maybe it is none that was moreconcentrated than
(E) perhaps none was more concentrated than


我的问题是黄色的那部分是强调句吗?谢谢谢谢
作者: shalinzz    时间: 2010-5-26 21:25
所谓强调句就是你把it is that去掉后句子仍然成立,但只有it is that 和it is who 的形式
作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-5-26 21:25
it is none that is more.. wordy;also,in this context,it must refers to sth,(unlike the phase such as “it is clear that..”)
OG解释是it必须要有指代,是不是就是说,这个句式不是强调句

那么OG12-3
it was not until almost 1900 that scholars and critics seriously began studying
这是个什么?是强调句吗?

混乱~!!
作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-5-26 21:26
所谓强调句就是你把it is that去掉后句子仍然成立,但只有it is that 和it is who 的形式
-- by 会员 shalinzz (2010/5/26 21:25:15)




那么这句话it is that去掉以后也是合理的啊
none is more...
那不就是说明他是强调句了吗?我觉得这个结构就是强调句啊
wordy我能理解,可是为什么OG说it必须要有指代呢?
既然是强调句就不用要求it有指代了啊
作者: shalinzz    时间: 2010-5-26 21:37
我个人认为就是这样,满足去掉后仍成立的就是强调句(高中老师反复强调的)
og解释没细看,但通常这个不会成为你做题的障碍,因为强调句肯定不怎么简洁,在有其他优先的选择下当然不选它
至于it was not until almost 1900 that scholars and critics seriously began studying这道题,我认为就是强调句,但因其他各项均有错,这个相比较最好
gmat中貌似没有强调句的考点
一家之言,等待nn进一步解释
作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-5-26 21:44
恩 谢谢
我就是不明白为什么两个都是强调句,第三题不要求it有指代,而第4题却要求it有指代

继续求解
作者: jtrchina    时间: 2010-5-29 18:09
恩 谢谢
我就是不明白为什么两个都是强调句,第三题不要求it有指代,而第4题却要求it有指代

继续求解
-- by 会员 AmyGMAT (2010/5/26 21:44:24)



OG12-4中
it is none that is moreconcentrated than
不仅可以理解为强调,如LZ所述
语法上亦可以如下理解:
【it】(is)[none]<that is more concentrated than>
【】主语
()谓语
[]宾语
<>限定性定语从句修饰none


如此断句后原句为简单句,主谓宾+从句的形式,此时主语it则必须要有指代对象


同理
it was not until almost 1900 that scholars and critics seriously began studying,
无论如何断句,that都无法做从句,只能与前it was……that搭配为标准强调句样式,便不会产生歧义
作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-5-29 19:38
恩 谢谢
我就是不明白为什么两个都是强调句,第三题不要求it有指代,而第4题却要求it有指代

继续求解
-- by 会员 AmyGMAT (2010/5/26 21:44:24)




OG12-4中
it is none that is moreconcentrated than
不仅可以理解为强调,如LZ所述
语法上亦可以如下理解:
【it】(is)[none]<that is more concentrated than>
【】主语
()谓语
[]宾语
<>限定性定语从句修饰none


如此断句后原句为简单句,主谓宾+从句的形式,此时主语it则必须要有指代对象


同理
it was not until almost 1900 that scholars and critics seriously began studying,
无论如何断句,that都无法做从句,只能与前it was……that搭配为标准强调句样式,便不会产生歧义
-- by 会员 jtrchina (2010/5/29 18:09:26)



哇 多些 J兄
作者: puqiandi    时间: 2010-5-29 21:38
感觉none is more concentrated 就有强调的感觉了,再强调就wordy了
作者: yoshimihoku    时间: 2010-5-29 23:38
Of all the vast tides of migration that have swept through history, maybe none is more concentrated as  the wave that brought 12 million immigrants onto American shores in little more than three decades.

B. it may be that none is more concertrated as
B的错误有"more..as..",有"it may be that none is" too wordy

但因为该题OG强调主句的2个比较句应为相同的过去式语态,因此B是不是还有一个"none is"的错误?应该改为"none was"?
OG没有指出这个错误。我不知道这里的none is究竟是对还是错
作者: LEDGIRL    时间: 2010-6-25 07:09
想了一个简单的办法,如果能用 it is none that ,,,,,  本身就是错误的,真想强调的话, 用 there is none that (虽然这个也是WORDY的)
作者: colorsmile    时间: 2010-7-5 12:04
brought 12 million immigrants onto  Americanshores
这边的 BROUGHT ONTO  可以这样子说吗??为什么是ONTO??




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3