ChaseDream

标题: GWD语法一题，求解 [打印本页]

作者: 56summer 时间: 2010-5-25 19:48
标题: GWD语法一题，求解

GWD-8-Q11:

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

A. There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

B. There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.

C. There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.

D. Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.

E. Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.

这题为什么不选E呀，谁能告诉我E错在哪里？？

作者: jtrchina 时间: 2010-5-25 20:04
Like/Unlike 在句首，主句在其后，中间以逗号隔开的形式要求Like/Unlike的逻辑主语与主句主语相一致，若E改为
Unlike catching cod and haddock， catching monkfish ……
则正确

作者: 56summer 时间: 2010-5-25 20:08
恩恩，懂了，谢谢~~
不过A选项的结构感觉有点奇怪呀，可不可以讲解一下呢~~~

作者: jtrchina 时间: 2010-7-4 08:12

恩恩，懂了，谢谢~~
不过A选项的结构感觉有点奇怪呀，可不可以讲解一下呢~~~

-- by 会员 56summer (2010/5/25 20:08:26)

A选项中代词their不当
据题意，depletion针对是monkfish而言，应改为单数代词its指代

此外，A有改变句子重心之嫌，原意突出对不种类鱼群的limits差异，选项A将对比的一部分以插入语形式表述，降低其重要性（插入语原则：（1）不影响主句结构（2）去掉不影响句意理解，可有可无）
结构：There are no legal limits（简单句前半）, as there are for cod and haddock,（插入语）， on the size of monkfish that can be caught（简单句后半）, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing（circumstance 引导同位语概括前述内容，作补充）

hope it helps!

作者: miller811 时间: 2010-7-5 01:20
fish是复数
我是用排除法凡是monkfish, which contribute to的都错就只剩ABE
BE中unlike结构错了所以选A

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)