ChaseDream

标题: 一道疑惑很久的题目~ [打印本页]

作者: yaoxiayi 时间: 2010-5-21 20:21
标题: 一道疑惑很久的题目~
59. Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down.
(A) do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find
(B) do not always results from malice; nations, just as individuals, finding
(C) do not always results from malice; nations, such as individuals, can find
(D) aren’t always the results of malice; nations in the same way that individuals can find
(E) aren’t resulting always from malice; just like individuals who can find

答案选A，不懂哎~~后半句是句子吗？

作者: silent7706 时间: 2010-5-21 22:10
是。

作者: puqiandi 时间: 2010-5-21 23:00
为什么?前面有个for什么意思

作者: silent7706 时间: 2010-5-21 23:06
for 可以表示原因。

作者: puqiandi 时间: 2010-5-21 23:08
那不是半句句子吗

作者: silent7706 时间: 2010-5-21 23:15

那不是半句句子吗

-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/21 23:08:17)

不是，因为前面已经有了分号。分号后面只能接完整的句子如果我没有记错的话。

作者: puqiandi 时间: 2010-5-21 23:17
for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down. 是for 引导的表示因为什么的从句的话就不是一句句子了?

作者: silent7706 时间: 2010-5-22 00:39

for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down. 是for 引导的表示因为什么的从句的话就不是一句句子了?

-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/21 23:17:51)

我是这样理解的，"for" works as "because" in this case. So the sentence reads, "because nations can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down."

作者: puqiandi 时间: 2010-5-22 17:16
unable to back down没有主语和谓语诶，不是主句吧

作者: silent7706 时间: 2010-5-22 23:31

unable to back down没有主语和谓语诶，不是主句吧

-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/22 17:16:53)

我觉得应该是修饰语, 修饰 "difficult positions"，但是不是很确定。

作者: ranshuyang 时间: 2010-5-23 09:00

for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down. 是for 引导的表示因为什么的从句的话就不是一句句子了?

-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/21 23:17:51)

我是这样理解的，"for" works as "because" in this case. So the sentence reads, "because nations can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down."

-- by 会员 silent7706 (2010/5/22 0:39:03)

但是如果这样理解，不是就不应该用“；”，而应该用“，”吗？我怎么记得“；”应该是连接两个完整句子的吗？

作者: silent7706 时间: 2010-5-23 22:57

for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down. 是for 引导的表示因为什么的从句的话就不是一句句子了?

-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/21 23:17:51)

我是这样理解的，"for" works as "because" in this case. So the sentence reads, "because nations can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down."

-- by 会员 silent7706 (2010/5/22 0:39:03)

但是如果这样理解，不是就不应该用“；”，而应该用“，”吗？我怎么记得“；”应该是连接两个完整句子的吗？

-- by 会员 ranshuyang (2010/5/23 9:00:40)

我也有类似的疑问。但是你看所有选项都有分号。所以只能选比较好的那个。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)