ChaseDream

标题: 后天就考了，请教一道GWD的逻辑题，谢谢！ [打印本页]

作者: peixy 时间: 2010-5-15 13:33
标题: 后天就考了，请教一道GWD的逻辑题，谢谢！

A shortage of orders for Manto Aircraft's airliners has led analysts to predict that

the manufacturer will have to lay workers ,the new order that consolidated

airlines has just made for 20 of Manto's model TX jets does not provide a reason

for the analysts to revise their predictions ,because simultaneously with its new

order , consolidated canceled its existing order for an equal number of manto's

larger, more expensive model Z jets

which of the following ,if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A.Manto relies more heavily on outside subcontractors to provide the labor to manufacture the Model Z than it does the Model TX

B.The Manto employees who currently work to manufacture the model Z are Not proficient at manufacturing the model TX

C.Manto includes all required maintenance work for the first five years in the price of each jet it sells .

D.Manto has had to lay off workers several times within the past ten years but has typically rehired many of the workers when it subsequently received new orders.

E.A large number of the airliners in consolidated is fleet are at the beginning of their expected service life

请NN们帮忙解释和翻译一下选项，特别是E，非常感谢！

作者: sxf112233 时间: 2010-5-16 00:32
E?
没怎么看明白原文，好像说要造一个什么东西，然后绕来绕去的。
问驳斥
A.说M更重，原文没提过，杀
B.说工人在哪工作，无关，杀
C.好像说钱的事情，原文没说过，杀
D.M说要顾什么类型的员工，无关，杀
E.许多航线是太空梭在服役的早期。至少说那个东西如何，沾。选E.

作者: peixy 时间: 2010-5-16 08:58
楼主是在BS上课的吧？说的话跟GWD一模一样啊。。。

作者: liuconglei 时间: 2010-5-16 10:16
原文是说 M 公司因为订单少而要裁员，而且新来的20架TX飞机的订单也没用，因为多了这20架TX，却少了20架更贵的Z。
原文支持裁员
A 说本来这 20 架 Z 就不是 M 公司的员工生产的，所以少了 20 架 Z 不会造成 M 公司的员工没活干。
B 说造 Z 的员工不会熟练造 TX 而我公司已经接了造TX订单且关键是把造Z订单给取消了你既然不熟练造TX 我留你何用是支持裁员的。这是加强项。

作者: peixy 时间: 2010-5-16 11:47
谢谢LS的解释，这道题选E噢~~

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)