标题: 求助GWD 8 Q14 GWD 2 11 [打印本页] 作者: 葛佳 时间: 2010-5-13 13:44 标题: 求助GWD 8 Q14 GWD 2 11 people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites. 结论这句话怎么理解？ 看不懂E 为什么不对？作者: yangyuxiao 时间: 2010-5-13 17:33
先来个对LZ这句话的翻译： 那些喜欢喝酒但是又对sulfites过敏的人们能够喝这种由这些酿酒者制造的酒，而不会冒着对sulfites过敏的风险。
E选项是什么？LZ贴下原文哈~~作者: 葛佳 时间: 2010-5-13 21:21 GWD-8-Q14: GWD-2-11 Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A.These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.
B.Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.
C.Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.
D.Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.
E.Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines. 作者: 葛佳 时间: 2010-5-13 21:23