标题: AI 一篇 如何破题 [打印本页] 作者: crystalvine212 时间: 2010-5-13 10:10 标题: AI 一篇 如何破题 Celebrities are uniquely qualified to efficiently address social problems, because of their high-profile status and access to resources. 作者: Sharonluo33 时间: 2010-5-13 15:30
贴一篇自己的文章，一起讨论 Celebrities are uniquely qualified to efficiently address social problems, because of their high-profile status and access to resources.
The issue at hand is whether celebrities are uniquely qualified to effciently address social problems. They have high-profile status and easy access to resources, which makes them frequently in front of cameras and media so it would be easy for them to express ideas and thoughts and make their voices heard publicly. But it is not always the appropriate way to let celebrities qualified for addressing social problems, because it is not their duty to do so.
It is in the best interest of political figures and government officials to address social problems, it would be inappropriate to let such a duty fall upon the shoulder of celebrities. Very often we see the political figures and government officials stand in front of mass media during a press conference, and make public announcement or news bulletin concerning public issues and social phenomenon. Such as the white house weekly press conference addressing social issues and schedules of the week, and the presidential weekly speech focusing on certain topics during the week. Such a weekly address would inform the public of the currently on-going matters in the country and how the government, local districts cope with these matters which closely relate to people's lives. The effort and method involved in those issues must be taken in a political range, and should be called upon by political figures as it is their duty to do so.
Additionally, although celebrities have high-profile status, they don't necessarily have the potential and adequate backgroud information to address social issues properly. They need to be careful of their speech and action, as their high-profile status could largely influence many people. As in the case of Sharon Stone, who remarked on the terrible earthquake in China last year, she described it to be a carma because Chinese people didn't treat Tibetans well. Her comment infuriated many people who were devoted to resuing those buried in the debries and suffered from the loss of family members and property loss, and a nationwide criticism surged against her.
Admittedly, celebrities could influence people to some extent, but this doesn't mean they could be qualified to take the job of well addressing public issues and appropriately expressing public concerns. They might simply overstate or understate social issues due to lack of necessary research methods and enough information, and their remarks and comments would cause public sensations and incur turbulent clashes among different groups of people so they need to be discreet when showing their opinions. It is often seen that many entertainment celebrities aviod the political topics, because they are afraid to get involved in unnecessary troubles.
To conclude, the duty of addressing public issues is better let to political figures and government officials as they know in a professional way how to address appropriately. With necessary research method and survey results, those people could present a comparatively object fact and influence a large population. Celebrities should be careful to express their opinions otherwise their public images could be negatively affected.作者: 蚊子漫步 时间: 2010-5-14 10:51
楼上的文章可以拿6分了吧。感谢分享思路作者: horacetengolin 时间: 2010-7-5 16:32
agree ls作者: hey_cathy 时间: 2010-7-11 15:36
高手作者: 程喷喷 时间: 2010-7-13 09:35
好强....额.....作者: Savina0720 时间: 2010-7-13 22:23
感谢分享~~作者: oswan 时间: 2010-7-17 18:22
很棒的文章，感谢分享作者: feid1984 时间: 2010-7-24 23:29
强悍，拜读，学习作者: 蚊子飞飞1号 时间: 2010-7-29 11:35
请教一下，access to resources 是什么意思啊，这个resources指的是媒体？作者: 蚊子飞飞1号 时间: 2010-7-29 11:36
请问你对access to resources是怎么理解的呢，是媒体么？作者: bennywang2usa 时间: 2010-8-2 16:22
敢问楼主，这道题库里没有的题是从哪里找到地？作者: 野田大妹子 时间: 2010-8-2 20:43
同LS问啊作者: silencia1025 时间: 2010-8-5 20:53
额。。。address social problems 是 解决社会问题， 还是评论社会问题呢？？ 明天就要考了。。。。。。。T.T作者: ccao1988 时间: 2010-8-8 10:39
贴一篇讨论 It seems unfair to assign the responsibility for social problems to celebrities solely on the basis of their status or resources. It is true that the more powerful people is, the more accountabilities he or she should take, in my view, however, social problems are so complex that not everyone could solve only by their status or celebrity effect, nor those public figures should be forced to address the problems that they are not good at.
Celebrities, as ordinary people, do have some social responsibility to contribute to the society, and they do have more power to draw public attentions to those problems by their popularity. However, various social problems today are derived from different social background and those celebrities have no other measures to really address such problems as environmental pollution, nuclear weapons proliferation, or terrorism but to only advertise some ideas or introduce some policies by their brandname. Consider, for instance, such famous sports stars as Kobe Bryant or Tiger Woods, who have been the ambassdars of some international non-profit organizations, either to fight against AIDS or to advertise environment-friendly measures. However, we cannot presume that they can address these complicated problems which encountered the whole world.
Even it is granted that they are capable of dealing with some of social problems, they cannot be forced to take that assigned responsibility and even be criticized by public due to the unsolved problems. Everyone in the world has their own social role. Celebrities, has no natural or regulated task to address those problems beyond their power. It is unfair to force a certain Hollywood superstar to address the AIDS problem when he or she didn’t have time or wasn’t willing to do that. They have rights to decide whatever they want on their own.
In the final analysis, it is more possible for celebrities to deal with some social problems by their relatively higher status or more resources available to them than common people. However, these problems, as mentioned above, cannot be solved simply by the status or the brand effect and the celebrities have freedom to do what they like to do.作者: andiwu 时间: 2010-8-11 21:02
楼主好强作者: andiwu 时间: 2010-8-11 21:08
想发表一点关于解读这个题目的看法： Celebritiesare uniquely qualified to efficiently address social problems, becauseof their high-profile status and access to resources.
