标题: OG12 39 一个比较有意思的问题~ [打印本页] 作者: 加州女孩 时间: 2010-5-10 23:44 标题: OG12 39 一个比较有意思的问题~ 39. In 1527 King Henry VIII sought to have his marriage to Queen Catherine annulled so as to marry Anne Boleyn. (A) so as to marry (B) and so could be married to (C) to be married to (D) so that he could marry (E) in order that he would marry B This alternative is ungrammatical and illogical: Henry could not marry simply on the basis of seeking an annulment.蓝色部分啥意思呢？作者: abjure 时间: 2010-5-11 00:31
and so 有因此的意思。你把因此带回句子中读读，作者: 加州女孩 时间: 2010-5-11 08:36
我觉得B除了be married有问题外，在因果关系上跟D没啥区别吖，为啥B的答案解释那样说啊？作者: jtrchina 时间: 2010-5-11 08:36
So that 表目的=in order to So表达因果 两者在逻辑意思的表述上有所差异 原题中Seek to带有目的性，是King Henry VIII意图移情别恋，另寻新欢的最好证据，故此处逻辑含义应表目的，用So that作者: 加州女孩 时间: 2010-5-11 08:52 标题: 嗯哼~ 嗯，正好解了我的惑，但是为啥因果就不可以啊？那位先生要跟那个女王解除婚约，所以就可以。。。作者: jtrchina 时间: 2010-5-11 09:17
It is better not to learn English in Chinese way. Let's get back to OG explanation: Henry could not marry simply on the basis of seeking an annulment. A,so B,表示A是B的充分条件，即A的发生足以导致B的发生。如果用So,则原句里讲annulment的签署必然发生King Henry VIII的marry.和一个人离婚与和另一个人结婚两者没有必然因果联系。这也就是OG中 could not marry simply on the basis,表明无因果关系存在的意思。故此处用So that 表King Henry VIII的目的为佳。作者: abjure 时间: 2010-5-11 09:25
同意楼上作者: 加州女孩 时间: 2010-5-11 19:39 标题: *_* Anyway,I am Chinese and not thinking as American.作者: jtrchina 时间: 2010-5-11 20:00
Anyway,I am Chinese and not thinking as American.
-- by 会员 加州女孩 (2010/5/11 19:39:18)
I have made a long-distance call to Dakota fanning on this question and what I wrote is what she replied to me.Thus it is 100% American style~作者: abjure 时间: 2010-5-11 22:22
呵呵 GOOD LOGIC.作者: bonnie0715 时间: 2010-5-20 17:54
thx for sharing作者: ozymendias 时间: 2010-5-20 19:49
受教了~ 但我还有一个问题：OG说A的so as to marry: it does not identify who will marry 这句话是什么意思啊，KH要marry不是挺清楚的嘛。。。为什么呢？作者: puqiandi 时间: 2010-5-20 22:17
KH sought to ( have ...annulled so as to marry) 括号里没有主语作者: 柠澈 时间: 2010-5-27 22:51
KH sought to ( have ...annulled so as to marry) 括号里没有主语
-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/20 22:17:35)
括号里为什么要有主语？这句话就是一句单纯的主谓结构句子呀。so as to不是相当于in order to嘛，表示目的。为什么错误类？作者: puqiandi 时间: 2010-5-28 15:45
错了，我觉得原因是没有so as to 合起来,表示目的的用法.只有 ...so...as to...表示结果的用法作者: greatbelief 时间: 2010-5-28 17:21
楼上的解释让我对正确答案理解了些，想问下A错的原因，(考虑到so as to 用于单一主谓结构，此题只有一个主语，所以就选了A) ，感谢各位！！！
