ChaseDream

标题: 求助 plausibility [打印本页]

作者: JerryGuan    时间: 2004-4-11 14:54
标题: 求助 plausibility

2-16.       Advertiser: The revenue that newspapers and magazines earn by publishing advertisements allows publishers to keep the prices per copy of their publications much lower than would otherwise be possible. Therefore, consumers benefit economically from advertising.


Consumer: But who pays for the advertising that pays for low-priced newspapers and magazines? We consumers do, because advertisers pass along advertising costs to us through the higher prices they charge for their products.


Which of the following best describes how the consumer counters the advertiser’s argument?


(A) By alleging something that, if true, would weaken the plausibility of the advertiser’s conclusion


(C) By offering an interpretation of the advertiser’s opening statement that, if accurate, shows that there is an implicit contradiction in it


答案A,我选了C


我不明白的是,第二个人对第一个人是weaken其可行性(plausibility),还是发现一个内在的矛盾(implicit contradiction );


不可行性(plausibility)一般用于recommendation,怎么可以用于对推理进行描述呢?



另外,我想问一下,逻辑大全有没有什么比较好的搜索方法?


有可能其他人已经问过了类似的题目哦。


这个版需要再规范一下。


作者: dorbear    时间: 2004-4-11 16:20

哥们,能从您先做起吗?将题号在题目上标完整,选项也帮忙补齐一下。因为只有这样才有可能进行有效的搜索。谢谢!至于提问,Consumer并没有对Advertiser的论述给出任何解释或引申含义,而只是提出一个事实来削弱其合理性。


作者: JerryGuan    时间: 2004-4-11 21:51

对,你说的对!第二个人顺着第一个人的意思,摆出另外一个事实,与第一个人结论相反。不是在解释第一个人的argument,从而发现其内在矛盾。

M-2-16.       Advertiser: The revenue that newspapers and magazines earn by publishing advertisements allows publishers to keep the prices per copy of their publications much lower than would otherwise be possible. Therefore, consumers benefit economically from advertising.

Consumer: But who pays for the advertising that pays for low-priced newspapers and magazines? We consumers do, because advertisers pass along advertising costs to us through the higher prices they charge for their products.

Which of the following best describes how the consumer counters the advertiser’s argument?

(A) By alleging something that, if true, would weaken the plausibility of the advertiser’s conclusion

(B) By questioning the truth of the purportedly factual statement on which the advertiser’s conclusion is based

(C) By offering an interpretation of the advertiser’s opening statement that, if accurate, shows that there is an implicit contradiction in it

(D) By pointing out that the advertiser’s point of view is biasedA

(E) By arguing that the advertiser too narrowly restricts the discussion to the effects of advertising that are economic






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3