ChaseDream

标题: 还是weaken题--大全I-7.谢谢大家了~ [打印本页]

作者: ellie78    时间: 2010-5-6 21:46
标题: 还是weaken题--大全I-7.谢谢大家了~
Whenever a major airplane accident occurs, there is a dramatic increase in the number of airplane mishaps reported, a phenomenon that may last for as long as a few months after the accident. Airline officials assert that the publicity given the gruesomeness of major airplane accidents focuses media attention on the airline industry and the increase in the number of reported accidents is caused by an increase in the number of news sources covering airline accident, not by an increase in the number of accidents.
Which of the following, if true, would seriously weaken  the assertions of the airline officials?
(A) The publicity surrounding airline accidents is largely limited to the country in which the crash occurred.
(B) Airline accidents tend to occur far more often during certain peak travel months.
(C) News organizations do not have any guidelines to help them decide how severe or how close an accident must be for it to receive coverage.
(D) Airplane accidents receive coverage by news sources only when the news sources find it advantageous to do so.
(E) Studies by government regulations show that the number of airplane flight miles remains relatively constant from month to month.
正确答案选B
我想知道为什么A不行?
题说:一旦有空难发生,媒体就玩儿命报道,所以,空难的增加是由媒体的大肆渲染而成,不是由于事故增多。
A想说空难报道是有受限要求的。--不是很好的削弱了题目的证据有效性构成了weaken么?
作者: ellie78    时间: 2010-5-7 08:03
再次呼唤~
作者: flames001    时间: 2010-5-7 14:30
楼主对A项的理解是不是有失偏颇。
A的意思是不是应该更贴近:大众对飞机事故的关注仅集中在发生了飞机事故的国家上。因此A是一个无关的选项。
作者: Ank    时间: 2010-5-7 20:33
我同意LS,虽然第一次看这题感觉B也挺不着边~~~
作者: bonnie0715    时间: 2010-5-8 19:25
同意LLS
作者: ellie78    时间: 2010-5-9 09:45
茅塞顿开~
谢谢楼上众友:-)
作者: labellor    时间: 2010-8-18 19:38
B attributes the cause to the certain peak months rather than to the number of new sources the officials asserted, thus weaken the assertions.
作者: 流放者归来    时间: 2012-9-14 18:43
同意LS!现象解析文,结论是对现象的解析,找另外可能的原因去削弱。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3