ChaseDream

标题: GWD2-Q10 [打印本页]

作者: rainbowmanutd 时间: 2010-5-2 14:35
标题: GWD2-Q10
Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville create sun acceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.
Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents. So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution.
Environmentalist: I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.
Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the following?

A.   Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of circumstances
B.   Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome
C.   Maintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires could be achieved in greater degree by a different means
D.   Claiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting the environmentalist’s position in order to be better able to attack it
E.   Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people

选E，请问B为什么不对？

作者: ruimiss 时间: 2010-5-2 21:17
顶。我也困惑~~~~我觉得B不错。如果是我选的话

作者: applejsjs 时间: 2010-5-6 09:22
顶，虽然在BE之间徘徊后选了E,但仍想不清楚B选项

作者: lovepiao 时间: 2010-5-6 19:30
我也选的B。。。。郁闷中~~~
谁来解答下哦~~~~

作者: lovepiao 时间: 2010-5-6 19:38
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-349142-1-1.html?SearchText=GWD 2 10
我找到的之前的帖~strawdog 解答的还不错哦！

作者: 巴赫 时间: 2010-9-14 19:36
B.Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome

assumption的内容是优点（brings many out-of-towners ）被产生优点的缺点(use of snowmobiles)超过了(因为如果没有use of snowmobile人会更多）。这就是Environmentalist的观点。而challenge这个观点则又与Environmentalist的观点相反。
所以B错了。

作者: ellawene 时间: 2011-7-6 22:44
E翻译出来就是：发言人表达会给一部分人受益，但是环保学者否认能够真正给这些人带来收益。

作者: sarahni 时间: 2012-9-13 14:36

B.Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome

assumption的内容是优点（brings many out-of-towners ）被产生优点的缺点(use of snowmobiles)超过了(因为如果没有use of snowmobile人会更多）。这就是Environmentalist的观点。而challenge这个观点则又与Environmentalist的观点相反。
所以B错了。

-- by 会员巴赫 (2010/9/14 19:36:17)

why not B???? still don't see...

作者: leadlife 时间: 2013-6-17 22:59
B这里的意思是Environmentalist challenges 自己的观点了。把B改成Environmentalist challenges the view of business spokesperson by the assumption that..............可能就对了。

作者: penghao07 时间: 2013-9-9 17:44

巴赫发表于 2010-9-14 19:36
B.Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associa ...

我擦豁然开朗这题太阴了看到“ certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome” 好多人都会忘记这个道理是被"Challenging"的

作者: W... 时间: 2021-6-6 16:10
B说反了吧
假设是certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome：负面超过正面结果，然后又challenge这个假设，就变成了支持正面结果超过负面结果，反了。（环保学家应该是支持负面结果更多的）
不对的话请指正~

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)