ChaseDream

标题: 求解新prep-27 谢谢!! [打印本页]

作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-4-30 21:03
标题: 求解新prep-27 谢谢!!
(A) When drafting theDeclaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's RightsConvention in 1848, included in it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was acall for female enfranchisement.

A选项错误首先drafting没有逻辑主语

我不明白的是这句话included in it bythe author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement.

我觉得这句话不就是个倒装吗?主语是a call 谓语是was

还原整句话就是a call for femaleenfranchisement was included in it 这样有错吗?

为什么prep笔记上说要在included前面加上what来做was a call的主语?

非常不理解

求解答 谢谢!!

作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-4-30 21:25
(C) When the Declaration of Sentiments drafted by Elizabeth CadyStanton was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Convention in 1848, a call for female enfranchisementhad been included in it.

(E) When Elizabeth Cady Stanton drafted theDeclaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, she included in it a callfor female enfranchisement.

再附上另一个问题。    C选项prep笔记上解释说使用被动语态无法表现出施动者是谁?我的问题是在被动这方面要求都是这么严格吗?一定要被动句子后面紧跟着动作的发出者吗?

另外认为C选项it指代模糊。模糊在哪里了?我看不出来C项的itE(正确选项)it有什么区别。

nn指教!

作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-4-30 21:28
大家来帮忙啊
我查过以前的帖子也有问我这两个问题,但都没得到解答。
nn们来帮助解决这个困难吧
谢谢啦!
作者: lwtianliang    时间: 2010-4-30 21:39
首先A选项前面是when drafting和逗号后的included,会让人产生疑问drafting是谁发出的?这个问题没有解决...C选项最后说in it,这个it 到底是指declaration还是convention不清楚,而E恰好让人接受起来没有歧义...
这是我的理解,不知道对不对
作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-4-30 21:42
可是E选项it之前也有declaration和convention啊
E为什么就没有指代模糊?
作者: lwtianliang    时间: 2010-4-30 21:44
可是读意思的话这个it只能够指declaration而不能是convention
作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-4-30 21:53
啊 我明白这一点了 谢谢楼上nn
因为E选项里的declaration有that从句修饰,所以it只能指代declaration
而C选项就不行

那有人来帮我解答一下第一个疑问吗?谢谢!!
作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-4-30 22:28
upupupupupupupupupupupupup
作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-4-30 23:23
up偶想知道答案啊!
作者: MollyDong    时间: 2010-5-1 10:50
就是因为这里面没有理由使用倒装,所以prep认为这个句子语法错误啊~正确的用法就是应该what was included in it by the author was a call...: what was included是主语从句,相当于一个名词,后面的was是谓语,a call是宾语
作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-5-1 11:31
就是因为这里面没有理由使用倒装,所以prep认为这个句子语法错误啊~正确的用法就是应该what was included in it by the author was a call...: what was included是主语从句,相当于一个名词,后面的was是谓语,a call是宾语
-- by 会员 MollyDong (2010/5/1 10:50:30)



哎 我实在转不过来了
what was included in it by the author was a call...:这句话是么有问题的,I know
可是, included in it was a call 又有什么不对呢 倒装过来就是:a call was included in it。
非常非常非常不明白
作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-5-1 14:47
up
作者: AmyGMAT    时间: 2010-5-1 23:54
顶上来 第一个问题继续求解
作者: luojihencha    时间: 2010-5-12 16:24
就是因为这里面没有理由使用倒装,所以prep认为这个句子语法错误啊~正确的用法就是应该what was included in it by the author was a call...: what was included是主语从句,相当于一个名词,后面的was是谓语,a call是宾语
-- by 会员 MollyDong (2010/5/1 10:50:30)




哎 我实在转不过来了
what was included in it by the author was a call...:这句话是么有问题的,I know
可是, included in it was a call 又有什么不对呢 倒装过来就是:a call was included in it。
非常非常非常不明白
-- by 会员 AmyGMAT (2010/5/1 11:31:11)

倒过来就是a call was included in it. 但是 前面的哦when drafting 的逻辑主语就是 a call 而a call 是不可以做drafting 的逻辑主语的。所以a选项错。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3