ChaseDream

标题: gwd7-Q1(TN版5-Q1)求助 [打印本页]

作者: shalinzz    时间: 2010-4-26 13:48
标题: gwd7-Q1(TN版5-Q1)求助
Although producer prices rose at an unexpectedly steep rate in September, analysts said that the increase resulted mostly from temporary factors and not necessarily foreshadowing that there would be a resurgence of inflation.







A.      factors and not necessarily foreshadowing that there would be



B.       factors and not necessarily that it foreshadowed



C.      factors and did not necessarily foreshadow



D.      factors, while not necessarily a foreshadowing of



E.       factors, while it did not necessarily foreshadow that there would be

请问:c选项会不会有歧义?did not necessarily foreshadow 和said 或resulted并列?
作者: windypig123    时间: 2010-4-26 16:09
foreshadow的主语是analysists.
作者: shalinzz    时间: 2010-4-26 23:31
怎么判断是analysists的?根据意思,感觉不明确啊
作者: windypig123    时间: 2010-4-27 11:37
不好意思,我理解错了
应该是increase的 谓语吧。和result并列
foreshadow是暗示,预示 应该是那个increase不会暗示着通货膨胀的到来
sorryla
不过,这题 其他几个选项明显错误。
有时候做语法不能一味地说有没有歧义,还是得从逻辑关系去推测
作者: lessso    时间: 2010-5-14 22:00
A的there would be是不是因为太啰嗦了而被排除了啊?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3