ChaseDream

标题: OG10 79 [打印本页]

---

作者: weirui5621    时间: 2010-4-24 16:36
标题: OG10 79

79. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?

(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?

(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?

(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?A

(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

那位大牛能帮忙解释下这题

---

作者: Phoebe907    时间: 2010-4-26 16:34
我也不明白这个，看OG的解释，看到一坨坨的，有人可以解释一下吗？

---

作者: cat19bear    时间: 2010-4-26 16:54
我认为：
句子的意思是 ，当被催眠者被施以聋子的命令后，他们回答 No 当催眠师问他们是否听的到

有些专家解释说 被催眠的对象被分成不同的部分，回答和被催眠为聋子的 不是一个部分

但是按照专家解释的逻辑：如果回答和催眠为聋子不是一个部分的话，回答应该回答 Yes，而不是No

所以选A

---

作者: weirui5621    时间: 2010-4-27 13:40
感谢楼上，我现在也明白这个题的意思啦

---

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)

Powered by Discuz! X3.3