For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city. There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?
(A) The exhaust from Palitito's few automobiles is not a significant threat to Palitito's buildings. (B) Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine exhaust. (C) Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another. (D) More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of transportation. (E) Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitito while their passengers are visiting a site.
C作者: summer虾 时间: 2010-4-21 22:24
顶啊~ 牛牛G友们看过来啊看过来~ 哪怕给个中文翻译都好啊==作者: 草稿纸 时间: 2010-4-21 22:28
A 反对前提，错 B 说的就是bus exhaust，所以无关 C 少于1/4时间在路上，就是说少于1/4的车子在路上开，其他3/4正好停在停车场，而不用停在路边空转 D 无关 E 路上转和路边空转马达是一样的，无关作者: summer虾 时间: 2010-4-21 22:31
A 反对前提，错 B 说的就是bus exhaust，所以无关 C 少于1/4时间在路上，就是说少于1/4的车子在路上开，其他3/4正好停在停车场，而不用停在路边空转 D 无关 E 路上转和路边空转马达是一样的，无关