ChaseDream

标题: OG12 93 [打印本页]

作者: 加州女孩    时间: 2010-4-20 20:13
标题: OG12 93
93.Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last because refiners are paving about S5 a barrel more for crude oil than thev were last year.
(A)Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel more for crude oil than they were
(B)Heating-oil prices are expected to rise higher this year over last because refiners pay about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did
(C)Expectations are for heating-oil prices to be higher this year than last year's because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did

(D)It is the expectation that heating-oil prices will be higher for this year over last because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel more for crude oil now than what they were
(E)It is expected that heating-oil prices will rise higher this year than last year's because refiners pay about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did
关于这个题 很多人都讨论过 但是没见大家探讨一下为什么A选项最后不用than they did。我的理解是:今年是are paying,应该是将要发生的 所以这里的are是助动词,但是后面的than they( )last year,应该不是than they were paying last year 吧,所以我觉得应该是than they paid 所以不应该是than they did 吗?
作者: 加州女孩    时间: 2010-4-20 22:38
自己顶一个,期待牛牛赐教吖~
作者: fylonglong    时间: 2010-4-20 23:12
为什么LZ感觉用are paying就是表示将要发生的事呢?
作者: 加州女孩    时间: 2010-4-20 23:18
标题: OG12 93
即使表示进行时,那后面平行的也是进行时,但是过去进行时在这里感觉不合适吧than they were paying?
作者: fylonglong    时间: 2010-4-20 23:28
refiners are paying 表示refiners现在正在paying,而比较是跟上一年同一时间作比较。那么上一年同一时间refiner在干吗呢?应该也在paying吧。
作者: 切尔西    时间: 2010-4-21 09:19
这个感觉应该因为前面是现在进行时,后面对应的就应该是过去进行时吧,否则时态上不能形成对称吧,另外这个选项也是5里面最好的一个
作者: purple_soul_m    时间: 2010-4-27 12:07
refiners are paying 表示refiners现在正在paying,而比较是跟上一年同一时间作比较。那么上一年同一时间refiner在干吗呢?应该也在paying吧。
-- by 会员 fylonglong (2010/4/20 23:28:29)



这个回答真帅,谢谢啦
作者: 小伊YSY    时间: 2010-6-20 20:24
没看懂呀,不明白呀,还是不懂呀……
作者: billntt    时间: 2010-7-5 16:22
其实,动词省略保留助动词是有条件的,就是在前面能找到相应的被省略动词,用did的话,那就意味着前面是paied了,但是没有paied,所以用were
作者: fiona1988325    时间: 2010-8-30 19:59
标题: 牛牛觉得是不是这样呢?
在逻辑意思上than后面肯定比较是去年的行为,所以they were( paying for crude oil last year) 如果用they did的话,前面其实必须是they pay,主句和比较从句也算是有明确的时间概念了~ 拙见~见笑了~
作者: innerwarrior    时间: 2011-4-5 22:08
再问下,they are paying的语义不是很奇怪嘛,pay又不是一个持续性动作~
作者: guojinxin    时间: 2011-4-5 22:23
今年用的是are paying 按照出题者的逻辑,去年指定得是were paying
作者: zhongshanlh    时间: 2012-3-28 16:36
嗯,同意,manhattan中助动词那章专门有讲到这点
其实,动词省略保留助动词是有条件的,就是在前面能找到相应的被省略动词,用did的话,那就意味着前面是paied了,但是没有paied,所以用were
-- by 会员 billntt (2010/7/5 16:22:48)


作者: TONYKMF    时间: 2018-12-1 09:56
切尔西 发表于 2010-4-21 09:19
这个感觉应该因为前面是现在进行时,后面对应的就应该是过去进行时吧,否则时态上不能形成对称吧,另外这个 ...

八年后再来回复一下,对比中时态不一致是可以的,参考曼哈顿SC 比较的那个章节,B真正错误的在其他的地方,摘自gmatclub:
Quote:
(A) Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel more for crude oil than they were

The pronoun “they” always jumps off the page at me, and in this case, it seems to refer to “refiners”, the most recent plural. That’s fine.

I’m also OK with the comparison: “refiners are paying… more for crude oil than they were [paying] last year.” I don't think that it’s ideal, but it’s definitely not wrong, and the GMAT would argue that the word “paying” is implied after “were.” Again, I’m not crazy about it, but it conveys the meaning clearly enough.

So let’s keep (A), I guess.

Quote:
(B) Heating-oil prices are expected to rise higher this year over last because refiners pay about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did

The phrase “expected to rise higher this year over last” is definitely a mess. You would never say that prices “rise higher.” They either just rise, or they just ARE higher. I’m also not sure why we would use “over last” instead of “than last.”

The placement of “more” is also really confusing. “More” modifies “pay about $5 a barrel”, and there’s no good reason to stick the word “more” so far away from the phrase it logically modifies.

But for whatever it’s worth: “they” still seems to refer perfectly reasonably to “refiners.” And the word “did” replaces the verb “pay” (or “paid”, since “did” is past tense). So those things are OK.

But I don’t think we can get over the silly placement of “more” and the "rise higher" mess at the beginning of the sentence. So (B) is out.




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3