ChaseDream
标题: og12 105 [打印本页]
作者: lindazyj 时间: 2010-4-17 22:59
标题: og12 105
Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on
her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating
them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully
coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix
Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinated them with her narratives and
为什么不选D呢，怎么看出来D是修饰illustration的呢
作者: cidisnotjayz 时间: 2010-4-17 23:12
要注意没划线部分
capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
你选D的话，就是her book illustrations 做 capitalized的主语
显然逻辑有问题。
作者: newca 时间: 2010-4-17 23:13
Carefully coordinated with her narratives
这个应该是独立主格吧？
独立主格的逻辑主语是逐句的主语，即Beatrix Potter，而不是her illustrations
作者: lindazyj 时间: 2010-4-18 22:05
怎么看出来的her book illustrations 做 capitalized的主语呢，in her book illustrations不是一个介词短语吗
作者: lindazyj 时间: 2010-4-18 22:07
D中独立主格的逻辑主语不是Beatrix Potter吗
作者: imagelan 时间: 2010-6-12 06:03
我理解独立主格，顾名思义就是自带逻主的分词形式。所以D不可能是独立主格，因为D中，carefully coordinated with her narratives,是没有逻主的。
-ing/done, SVO. 这种形式的逻主只能是主句的主语。只是-ing表主动，-done表被动。而D中，如表被动就是错误的。
作者: wolfheulen 时间: 2010-6-12 06:20
除去修饰的部分，这句话的中心意思是Beatrix Potter capitalized on her ZZZZZ in her book of illustrations. D的错误在于Carefully coordinated with her narratives用来形容Betrix Potter. Carefully coordinated with her narratives应该用来形容book of illustration，而不是作者。这种错误叫做dangling modifier
作者: robinwayne 时间: 2010-11-13 08:51
LS说的好
作者: alicejingli 时间: 2010-12-10 10:36
Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on
her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating
them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully
coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix
Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinated them with her narratives and
为什么不选D呢，怎么看出来D是修饰illustration的呢
-- by 会员 lindazyj (2010/4/17 22:59:07)
那怎样 判断出 分词部分是修饰illustrations?
A，B 错在哪里/
作者: deer321 时间: 2010-12-10 11:24
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinating them with her narratives,
---coordinating语法上指代illustration，逻辑上指代BP
。主语bp和谓语capitalized相隔太远
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating
them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
--coordinating语法上指代illustration，逻辑上指代BP
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully
coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix
Potter, in her book illustrations
--coordinated逻辑上应该指代illustration,语法上指代bp
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinated them with her narratives and
--coordinated 和capitalized都是做谓语指代BP，但是coordinated逻辑上应该指代illustration
个人理解open to discuss
作者: ccfelicia 时间: 2010-12-12 12:31
呃，看完彻底的混淆了.coordinating clause到底是应该修饰book illustrations还是应该修饰BP那？
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinating them with her narratives,
---coordinating语法上指代illustration，逻辑上指代BP
-这里面说coordinating clause应该指代bp。主语bp和谓语capitalized相隔太远
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating
them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
--coordinating语法上指代illustration，逻辑上指代BP
-所以还是应该指代BP(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully
coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix
Potter, in her book illustrations
--coordinated逻辑上应该指代illustration,语法上指代bp
-而这里就应该在逻辑上指代illustration?(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinated them with her narratives and
--coordinated 和capitalized都是做谓语指代BP，但是coordinated逻辑上应该指代illustration
-这个结论有何D相同了，说应该修饰llustration。还有一个错误不太确定的是，them-y应该是说他在书里用了很多记叙文，那么them逻辑上应该指book illustrations.illustrations是书名，所以应该用单数代词？个人理解open to discuss
-- by 会员 deer321 (2010/12/10 11:24:39)
作者: ccfelicia 时间: 2010-12-12 13:02
哦，我理解错了。看这样子理解对不对？
A coordinating them with her narratives因为是现在进行时，所以有点主动的含义，只有BP才能从逻辑上引导这个从句-同时ing这个形式有现在进行的含义，回合后面的capitalized混淆。还有一点就是主语和动词离得太远了
B 同理
D Coordinated就有被动的含义？所以应该修饰illustrations。但是这里却语法上修饰BP
E两个动词修饰的成分不一样，一个修饰illustrations，一个修饰BP，所以结构不正确
呼唤NNNN！
太纠结了
作者: lmiltamy 时间: 2010-12-24 00:46
在頂一下
作者: mboo2005 时间: 2011-2-1 22:14
我是这样理解的。如果是coordinating 的话，主语应该是人，就没法修饰illustration了。
哦，我理解错了。看这样子理解对不对？
A coordinating them with her narratives因为是现在进行时，所以有点主动的含义，只有BP才能从逻辑上引导这个从句-同时ing这个形式有现在进行的含义，回合后面的capitalized混淆。还有一点就是主语和动词离得太远了
B 同理
D Coordinated就有被动的含义？所以应该修饰illustrations。但是这里却语法上修饰BP
E两个动词修饰的成分不一样，一个修饰illustrations，一个修饰BP，所以结构不正确
呼唤NNNN！
太纠结了
-- by 会员 ccfelicia (2010/12/12 13:02:03)
作者: 戈弋 时间: 2011-5-1 17:53
关键是：coordinating的逻辑主语应当是BP
coordinated的逻辑主语应当是book illustrations
正确的选项应当是逻辑主语和句中根据语法分析出的主语一致；
错误的选项都在于上述两个词中的一个逻辑主语和语法主语不符，具体deer321 讲得很清楚。
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinating them with her narratives,
---coordinating语法上指代illustration，逻辑上指代BP
。主语bp和谓语capitalized相隔太远
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating
them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
--coordinating语法上指代illustration，逻辑上指代BP
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully
coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix
Potter, in her book illustrations
--coordinated逻辑上应该指代illustration,语法上指代bp
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully
coordinated them with her narratives and
--coordinated 和capitalized都是做谓语指代BP，但是coordinated逻辑上应该指代illustration
个人理解open to discuss
-- by 会员 deer321 (2010/12/10 11:24:39)
作者: pye34878 时间: 2011-5-1 18:34
个人理解这部分应该是：BP coordinate book illustrations with her narratives (此句语法和agreement可能不对，但重点在于表达BP是coordinate的主语，或者在原句中是逻辑主语，而book illustrations是coordinate的宾语，然后V-ING形式表主动，而v-ed形式表被动
A中因为cooridinating跟在名词book illustrations之后，可能误解为其逻主是book illustrations，且，如LS所说，主谓之间相隔太远使句子主干confusing。
B中直接是book illustrations做了coordinating的逻辑主语，而实际上其逻主应为BP
C中which指代book illustrations做coordinated的宾语（在定语从句中关系代词代替先行词，可以做从句的主语或宾语，区分二者可以看从句中有没有出现新的名词作为主语，在此句中因为出现了另一主语she所以which在这里只能作宾语，符合原句的逻辑意思）
D中coordinated是被动态，但却修饰BP，而BP事实上应该是coordinate的主语，所以这里应该用coordinating修饰BP表示BP为coordinate这个动作的执行者，而D项表达的意思是BP是coordinate这个动作的承受者
E。注意ABCD项中coordinated/coordinating一词是以非谓语形式出现的，因此符合之前说的V-ING表主动，V-ed表被动的说法，但E项中coordinated 与 capitalized用and连接共同作为BP的谓语动词，实际上改变了句子的重心。原句强调的只是capitalized这个动作，而coordinated只是起状语修饰作用而已。
不知这样的解释对楼主有没有帮助？
作者: ssyy23 时间: 2011-7-19 22:27
牛人们，此题选什么？
作者: miasxy 时间: 2011-9-26 09:51
你说的真好！！！
个人理解这部分应该是：BP coordinate book illustrations with her narratives (此句语法和agreement可能不对，但重点在于表达BP是coordinate的主语，或者在原句中是逻辑主语，而book illustrations是coordinate的宾语，然后V-ING形式表主动，而v-ed形式表被动
A中因为cooridinating跟在名词book illustrations之后，可能误解为其逻主是book illustrations，且，如LS所说，主谓之间相隔太远使句子主干confusing。
B中直接是book illustrations做了coordinating的逻辑主语，而实际上其逻主应为BP
C中which指代book illustrations做coordinated的宾语（在定语从句中关系代词代替先行词，可以做从句的主语或宾语，区分二者可以看从句中有没有出现新的名词作为主语，在此句中因为出现了另一主语she所以which在这里只能作宾语，符合原句的逻辑意思）
D中coordinated是被动态，但却修饰BP，而BP事实上应该是coordinate的主语，所以这里应该用coordinating修饰BP表示BP为coordinate这个动作的执行者，而D项表达的意思是BP是coordinate这个动作的承受者
E。注意ABCD项中coordinated/coordinating一词是以非谓语形式出现的，因此符合之前说的V-ING表主动，V-ed表被动的说法，但E项中coordinated 与 capitalized用and连接共同作为BP的谓语动词，实际上改变了句子的重心。原句强调的只是capitalized这个动作，而coordinated只是起状语修饰作用而已。
不知这样的解释对楼主有没有帮助？
-- by 会员 pye34878 (2011/5/1 18:34:54)
作者: whenusmile 时间: 2011-9-29 09:27
对此题也有疑问。感觉OG对这题的解释不清不楚的，头晕。。
作者: whenusmile 时间: 2011-9-29 09:34
感觉15楼对E选项的解释太好了吧。本来一直疑惑，现在有醍醐灌顶之感，真心地谢谢NN。
作者: zhongshanlh 时间: 2012-2-27 11:04
个人看到15楼NN的解释，很清楚很逻辑，佩服！
但是我个人有一个观点，不知道对不对，所以提出来共大家批判。。。
B选项中，“In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter”
15楼的NN解释的是中间的ing修饰的逻辑主语是前面的book illustration，但是我有一个不同的观点是这里的这个B的结构犯的错误时superbat（印象中夹心这个说法是bat大神提出来的。。。。）前面总结出的一种“夹心错误”。
即“n， + -ing + ，n”的结构既可以把-ing当做修饰前面的n也可以当做修饰后面的n，进而产生了歧义，所以叫夹心错误。
我认为B应该是犯了这种错误。
当然OG的官方解释我也看到了，说的是ing修饰的是book illustration。但是从语法上这种夹心错误的ing修饰对象有没有优先修饰前面其次修饰后面这种顺序我自己确实不太清楚。
希望大家拍砖
作者: lalapiao 时间: 2012-3-18 19:18
个人看到15楼NN的解释，很清楚很逻辑，佩服！
但是我个人有一个观点，不知道对不对，所以提出来共大家批判。。。
B选项中，“In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter”
15楼的NN解释的是中间的ing修饰的逻辑主语是前面的book illustration，但是我有一个不同的观点是这里的这个B的结构犯的错误时superbat（印象中夹心这个说法是bat大神提出来的。。。。）前面总结出的一种“夹心错误”。
即“n， + -ing + ，n”的结构既可以把-ing当做修饰前面的n也可以当做修饰后面的n，进而产生了歧义，所以叫夹心错误。
我认为B应该是犯了这种错误。
当然OG的官方解释我也看到了，说的是ing修饰的是book illustration。但是从语法上这种夹心错误的ing修饰对象有没有优先修饰前面其次修饰后面这种顺序我自己确实不太清楚。
希望大家拍砖
-- by 会员 zhongshanlh (2012/2/27 11:04:02)
ls提出的夹心错误很有用，但是B的coordinating后面已有一个them，所以当然不能修饰them 所指代的“in her book illustrations”。个人观点，欢迎讨论。
我有一个问题：E与前四项相比确实不一致，但这不算错误吧？个人觉得E语义并没有错误的。求解释！！
作者: lalapiao 时间: 2012-3-18 19:26
刚找到答案，就自己贴出来了。
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
in her book illustrations is an essential modifier。插入语可省略，而省略后原句中them就没了指代。
作者: zhongshanlh 时间: 2012-4-8 16:36
刚找到答案，就自己贴出来了。
(E) Beatrix Potter,
in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
in her book illustrations is an essential modifier。插入语可省略，而省略后原句中them就没了指代。-- by 会员 lalapiao (2012/3/18 19:26:51)
其实这个E选项，如果单单是从一个句子的角度来看的，E的语法和逻辑含义角度我个人认为都是没有错误的，Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated themwith her narratives and capitalized on her keen observation andlove of the natural world.这个句子中BP是主语，后面的coordinated与capitalized是谓语动词，them指代前面的illustrations，没有任何问题，逻辑含义方面，句子的意思为——在书的插图中，BP将插图与她的叙述很好的结合在了一起并且BP利用了她对自然的细致观察和热爱。说实话，单单看这个句子我觉得没有任何问题
但是我们看OG的解释the participial phrase does not clearly modify book illustrations，OG这么说的意思就是OG从一开始就把coordinate定义为了修饰illustrations的一个过去分词的结构，因此不能把这个过去分词（即非谓语动词与句子本来的谓语动词capitalized用and 并列在一起），我现在是明白OG这么解释的原因了，但是呢，觉得OG这么解释欠缺一下说服力啊！
作者: bellelan 时间: 2012-5-10 21:56
对于A、B还是不懂，求解释：
doing结构的修饰短语不是无论前面后面有多少成分都直接修饰句子主语吗？
A是：n, in介词短语, coordinating。coordinating的语法主语怎么会是介词短语中的n呢？
B是：in介词短语, coordinating, n。同A
看好多其他题目，doing结构都所谓修饰成分直接修饰句子主语，如果是这样，A、B的逻辑主语和语法主语是一致的呀。
求解答………………
作者: lalapiao 时间: 2012-7-28 14:19
[quote]
对于A、B还是不懂，求解释：
doing结构的修饰短语不是无论前面后面有多少成分都直接修饰句子主语吗？
A是：n, in介词短语, coordinating。coordinating的语法主语怎么会是介词短语中的n呢？
B是：in介词短语, coordinating, n。同A
看好多其他题目，doing结构都所谓修饰成分直接修饰句子主语，如果是这样，A、B的逻辑主语和语法主语是一致的呀。
求解答………………-- by 会员 bellelan (2012/5/10 21:56:12)
[/quot
我认为这道题是1.避免指代产生歧义。逗号doing结构修饰的是前面的动作，而逻辑主语是动作发出者=主句主语。
2。2个或2个以上的modifier的位置摆放。
因为A前面有两个名词，按照modifier的规律来看，就是就近修饰-动作发出者为illustration，而逻辑上应为BP。B选项以此类推就是夹心修饰，动作发出可以是illustration也可以是后面的BP。（前面已经说过的，就不细说了。。）
这道题提醒我们，2个modifier在逻辑主语之前出现时，为了避免出现指代或修饰出错，最好把两个modifier变成一个modifier和一个从句（manhattan里有讲过）。
作者: lalapiao 时间: 2012-7-28 14:20
agree！！我也重新来看这道题了。
作者: francescjcj 时间: 2012-9-25 14:18
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world. 这里的 加了which，那后面不是应该还有一句illustration当主语的话吗 不然从句不完整了啊？求NN答疑
作者: estellegmat 时间: 2013-6-12 13:57
弱弱的想问一句，是不是当有两个phrases或以上的去形容subject,就要把subject靠的离verb越近越好啊?
作者: jayhung 时间: 2013-8-30 13:45
我个人感觉这题还是要从语义上来解决：首先当coordina....这个部分是作为一个modifier的时候它显然是修饰illustration的，因为potter这个人和她的叙述没什么好“调和”的。从语义上来说，如果coordi...这个部分作为和capitalized平行并列的主要内容又不合适：potter将她的illustrations和narratives调和，同时利用了她敏锐的观察和对大自然的爱（实际上后者的利用是前者能够调和的原因和方法，不能并列，何况是前者放在前面）
再来看这个选项：A.coordinating..修饰illustrations，所以是被动，因为是被调和。
B.和A一样的问题
D.违反touch rule，modifier修饰不当。
E.语法上没问题，但是上面说了两个事情并列是不可取的，逻辑中心发生了改变。
所以是D最好了
og上说A里的现在分词形式违反了调和与利用两个事情的先后顺序，这里也是一个关于逻辑顺序的佐证，但我个人对于分词modifier的时态意味不是很感冒，因为主被动和时态有时候不能两全，所以我一般就看主被动（这里我比较迷惑，请各位指教）。
作者: jayhung 时间: 2013-8-30 13:53
estellegmat 发表于 2013-6-12 13:57 
弱弱的想问一句，是不是当有两个phrases或以上的去形容subject,就要把subject靠的离verb越近越好啊? ...
我觉得还是不要这样去记，这里也的主要问题也不是subject和verb远近的问题。当然就这题的A来讲的话确实感觉整句话理解起来不是非常自然通顺。gmat里的正确句子都是根据要表达的内容的最舒服，层次最自然的句子
作者: neacholas 时间: 2013-9-13 11:26
想请教一下大家，在选项C中
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
既然which指代book illustrations，那正确的句子不应该是in which she carefully coordinated...吗？
作者: bbrr1105 时间: 2013-9-17 08:31
neacholas 发表于 2013-9-13 11:26
想请教一下大家，在选项C中
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her na ...
Coordinate A with B. book illustration 是A。就是which在它的定语从句中作coordinate的宾语，不用加in的。
作者: neacholas 时间: 2013-9-18 10:53
bbrr1105 发表于 2013-9-17 08:31
Coordinate A with B. book illustration 是A。就是which在它的定语从句中作coordinate的宾语，不用加in ...
看来还是自己没正确理解句意导致的。非常感谢！
作者: 千贺铃 时间: 2013-12-21 23:07
本人不才，找了beatthegmat的Ron大神的部分解释。
http://www.beatthegmat.com/doubt-regarding-the-use-of-present-participle-modifier-t64660-15.html
Ron不太同意OG的解释。
作者: andy2086 时间: 2013-12-29 17:58
deer321 发表于 2010-12-10 11:24
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefullycoordinating them with her narratives,---coo ...
看了你的解释，豁然开朗。从语法上和逻辑上两个角度切入，给我很大启发。谢谢。
作者: Jagabee 时间: 2014-1-27 12:15
105真是变态的一题 直到2014年还可以接着炒剩饭
看了各种解释很头痛，但也挑出了几个能说服自己的
5个选项本人唯一可以坚决排除的就是D, 过去分词和主动的动作不符
接下来对于E，自己接受coordinate从状语变成谓语， 改变了句子重心和语义的这个说法
A,B自己不太认同用coordinating 在修饰illustration导致和逻辑主语BP不符的这个概念......即便coordinating离illustration比较近, 在G中不是经常有这样的情况但是考点在于确认考生是否意识到主句主语才是动作发生的主体么？
除了A中的主句主语和谓语隔太远之外，看了又看我觉得问题应该是在选项中的代词“them，” 并不能用来指代介词短语中的illustration. 如果把句子再重组一下，原句变成：
Carefully coordinating them with her narratives in her book illustration, BP.........无论把in her book illustration放哪, 这个them感觉都很怪，指代不清的感觉，有指代“her keen observation and love of the natural world”的嫌疑.
还有没有人在2014一起研究这道题！
作者: Jagabee 时间: 2014-1-27 12:25
千贺铃 发表于 2013-12-21 23:07
本人不才，找了beatthegmat的Ron大神的部分解释。
http://www.beatthegmat.com/doubt-regarding-the-use-of ...
这个链接很有用!Ron的解释非常好. Thanks!
作者: lesley0927 时间: 2014-3-2 15:32
我觉得看懂意思就好做啦，主语是人，三个动词要平行就可以了
作者: YvaineDing 时间: 2014-5-16 02:12
pye34878 发表于 2011-5-1 18:34
个人理解这部分应该是：BP coordinate book illustrations with her narratives (此句语法和agreement可能 ...
so good...所以E的错误就在于改变了原来的句子结构，如果究其本身的话，语法和逻辑没有错误
作者: wangwanwang 时间: 2014-9-26 15:46
还是不懂，疯了
作者: InfiniteAlex 时间: 2014-10-2 12:49
(In her book illustrations(, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives),) Beatrix Potter...
作者: ettayi 时间: 2014-10-2 15:36
Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
這題很顯然是在考“介系詞片語In her book illustrations“的修飾關係
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
夾在Subject and Verb之間的句中“介系詞片語“修飾Subject(Beatrix Potter),無意義,刪掉
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
前後都是Noun.(illustrations/BP),會導致, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, 不知道要修飾誰,會有2種修飾的可能,刪掉
剩下(C)
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives：她小心的將解釋與她的敘述一致融(意思上ok)
In her book illustrations, Beatrix Potter capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world：BP把她細膩的觀察... capitalized in her book illustrations
作者: ttbb5357 时间: 2014-11-19 07:13
谁能把这题翻译一下啊 这尼玛从头看到尾不知道题什么意思 脑袋炸了
作者: hizxt 时间: 2014-11-20 12:02
为什么coordinating不能做状语呢？
作者: irisa听话 时间: 2015-9-23 23:56
我觉得这题还有个很大的错误就是them并不能指代illustration啊 因为曼哈顿里有说过 代词只能指代中心词 这种藏在介短里的词不能直接用them指代吧 不知道有没有人注意到这个问题呢
作者: 花儿mm 时间: 2016-2-29 13:46
我觉得楼上说的有道理，这道题根本找不出them的指代。
作者: KylinNie 时间: 2016-5-11 11:15
16年我还在为这个题头疼。。。不过好像略略有点懂了。。梳理一下自己。。。一定要理解句子的意思。。
原句是想说：BP（在illustritions里coordinate balabala，）capitalize balabala，coordinate的发出者是BP这个人，这个行为是在那个illustration里；
主干信息是capitalize，因此capitalize和coordinate的关系并不是平行，这个是两个独立的非并列的关系。。。
（小的好像梳理通自己的思路了！）
作者: Zweistein 时间: 2016-10-8 17:00
这个解释对我有帮助
作者: 猪小王 时间: 2017-2-3 12:38
从essential modifier vs. non-essential modifier的角度理解，这题很简单。
Nonessential modifier: if you remove it from the sentence, the core of the sentence stillmakes sense. 比如选项C, remove"which-modifier", 句子意思完整，清晰。
Essential modifier: it is necessary in order to understand the meaning of the sentence.
Beatrix Potter, M1, M2, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world. M1 & M2 are NONESSENTIAL MODIFIERS.
如果去掉M1, M2中的them指代什么？所以，A和B都是错误的，因为没有M1的话，句子意思受影响。
同理，去掉M1, E选项的them意思也不清楚，排除。
D的错误很明显，coordinated ...的逻辑主语应该是illustrations而不是Beatrix Potter.
只有C意思明确，即使没有"in her book illustrations“ 或没有"which she carefully coordinated with her narratives" (去掉任意一个), 句子意思都是完整的。
看下面的一道prep08题目：
ApprovedApril 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of thegovernment of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D .C .,also establishedthe Library of Congress.
A.Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for theremoval of the government of the United States to the new federal city,Washington, D .C ., also established
B. The actof Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for theremoval of the government of the United States to the new federal city,Washington, D .C ., also established
C. The actof Congress approved April 24, 1800, which made provision for the removal ofthe government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D .C., and established
D.Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government ofthe United States to the new federal city, Washington, D .C ., the act ofCongress also established
E. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congressmade provision for the removal of the government of the United States to thenew federal city, Washington, D .C ., also establishing
除了A中"that made provision for ...." 是essential modifier, 其它都是nonessential modifiers 或者是verb...
如果没有that made provision for ... 这个essential modifier，the act of Congress就成了Congress唯一的act了，显然逻辑上是错的，Congress每年有好多acts。
这题的正确答案就是A, 用别的方法思考会让问题变难，而用essential/nonessential modifier，答案就很明显了。
作者: michwang 时间: 2017-5-16 00:10
在网上看了下面这段解释
觉得非常的清晰！！
In this sentence, the big picture is Beatrix Potter capitalized on stuff. Where or how did she do this? In her illustrations, which she coordinated with her narratives. "Capitalized" and "coordinated" aren't really on the same level of meaning.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
A present participle like "coordinating" after a comma should modify to a complete clause before it. Here, though, there is no complete clause. There is just the subject "Beatrix Potter" followed by a modifying preposition "in her..." This usage of "coordinating" is incorrect.
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
Once again, we have two modifiers stacked in a row, both of which seem to be modifying the subject. Also, when "them" is used in an opening modifier beginning with a present participle, it should refer to the SUBJECT that comes after it, not a noun in another modifier before it.
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
Correct. The modifier "in her book illustrations" refers to the subject "Beatriz Potter," and "which she coordinated..." further modifies the illustrations.
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
This implies that Beatrix Potter herself, not her illustrations, was coordinated with the narratives. Nonsensical.
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
We should be able to remove any nonessential prepositional phrase and still maintain the intended meaning of the sentence. Here, if we said "Beatrix Potter... carefully coordinated them..." we would have no idea what "them" is. A pronoun should not be used as an object if the antecedent is within a modifying phrase.
作者: yoga1992 时间: 2017-6-9 06:35
我说一下自己对本题的理解，希望大家能给予指正。
此题语义是BP在book illustration中capitalized on her keen observation and love。。。, 同时BP将book illustration和她的narratives coordinated. 选项A中感觉present participle语法上指代illustration，逻辑上指代BP。因为participle前方没有clause，所以不存在指代整个clause并且修饰主语，我认为语法上participle在此就近指代。B当中present participle出现了一样的问题。逻辑主语和实际语法主语不一致。D选项直接让人觉得是BP把自己跟narratives coordinated了。E中其实是把coordinated 和 capitalized给并列了，让人觉得这两个action同时happens in her book illustration. 实际上只有capitalized这个action is in the book illustrations; BP是同时carefully coordinated the illustrations with the narratives. 所以E的语义是不正确的。
作者: Jinnjenny23 时间: 2017-6-13 02:46
今天翻到Ron关于Pronoun指代问题的解释（Ron在解释OG105时，提到这个问题），想到这道题：
Question: Are there any rules that state that a pronoun cannot reach inside to refer to a "modifier/prepositional/possessive?
Ron: The one place you generally shouldn't find the noun is inside a modifier that's blocked off by commas.
When a modifier is blocked off by commas, the purpose of the commas is to indicate, essentially, that the sentence should still make sense without that modifier (just with less description).
If the noun were within such a modifier, then removing the modifier would result in nonsense. Not good.
选项A,B,E中都存在them指代由comma隔开的non-essential modifier中的noun，如果把non-essential modifer拿掉，them没有了antecedent.
前面也有前辈提到这个点，今天翻出Ron的解释，更加信服。算是提供一个快速破题点吧。
作者: Aaronyin2 时间: 2017-6-24 10:28
观察句意，分清主次。 这个句子 capitalized on her keen observation 才是主句，前面是修饰，（这是因为capitalized没划线，肯定是主句的verb）,所以前面的一堆肯定是修饰语， 排除E，
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |