ChaseDream

标题: 请指教:大全7-13.谢谢~ [打印本页]

作者: ellie78    时间: 2010-4-15 16:01
标题: 请指教:大全7-13.谢谢~
The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government’s huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines ?
(A) The government has made little attempt to reduce the budget deficit.
(B) The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth.
(C) The value of the dollar declined several times in the year prior to the recent prediction of slower economic growth.
(D) Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused declines in the dollar’s value.
正选是D。句意没看明白,尤其是第二句:"But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government’s huge budget deficit,",有哪位达人给解释一下?
作者: sunluning0    时间: 2010-4-15 16:18
但是这种预期不会出现对美元的不良影响(贬值),如果政府不出现巨大的财政赤字。

意思是必须先存在巨大财政赤字的情况下,才会发生美元贬值的预期。这句也是结论。

D,说往往在赤字出现之前,经济衰退的预期已经造成美元贬值了。刚好推翻了。

反驳结论,本题,我觉得至少答案要提到“财政赤字”。
作者: ellie78    时间: 2010-4-15 16:50
谢谢楼上的解答:-)




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3