ChaseDream

标题: 关于分词短语的修饰问题 [打印本页]

作者: 超然成风    时间: 2010-4-12 18:37
标题: 关于分词短语的修饰问题
现在分词修饰的关系
Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride.



A. Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

B. Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, they cost less,

C. Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with most sport utility vehicles, and have a lower cost, they

D. Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

E. Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles the cost is lower, and they

答案选D,BCE因为并列句的主语没有省略很容易排除,但是A是不是因为那and应该省略,后面还有并列,d选项的两个分词放一起感觉很不好,而且现在分词多数出现在两个句子中间都是错误的,有修饰不清楚的嫌疑

作者: 小玲珑    时间: 2010-4-12 19:27
标题: 说说我的看法
我也是新手,不是很专业,但只谈一下我的看法,仅供参考。


B很明显的错误原因就是后面的主语they不应有。


C they如果指代就近名词的话是cost但它是单数,应用it指代。并且按照逻辑上的意思,they 应该指代minivans. 所以是指代不清的问题。


E中后面用and, 说明前面应是一个完整的句子。但实际上前面不是完整的,是dangling.


所以BCE确实是较容易排出的。


至于A的错误原因,我认为有两点:


其一:大致浏览下划线句的后面,会发现是许多do的并列结构,所以只能在最后一个动词原型前面加and, 所以passengers后面的and是应该去掉。


其二:分词短语在句中一般都是做状语,它的逻辑主语就是句子主语,所以你就知道这个句子是要把minivan(这种vehicle)和其他的vehicles相比的,所以每个do的分句都要有比较级。你看划线句后面的,都是有比较级的,如less, better, more easily, smoother. A的开头只是描述下minivan的特性,说它能载7个人,实际上不存在和其他vehicle比较的意思,所以它不属于和后面的do平行的结构。


分析到这,你自然就知道D为啥是最好的了。carrying、、、及compared、、、的逻辑主语都是minivan,而正符合本来的意思。这两个分句就都只是描述minivan的特性而已,不存在比较。而后面的do构成平行结构,且在最后一个do前加了andand是很必要的)。并且后面的都含有和其他vehicles的比较之意,都应有比较级,这符合这句话本来的逻辑意思。所以D是正确的。


如果有不同看法,欢迎交流讨论~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3