ChaseDream

标题: 真心求教LSAT基础题目一个！怎样做好LSAT逻辑呀？？？/LSAT-2-2-14 [打印本页]

作者: dxwei2008 时间: 2004-4-7 22:08
标题: 真心求教LSAT基础题目一个！怎样做好LSAT逻辑呀？？？/LSAT-2-2-14
Test2中第二个section的14题

做完了GMAT的逻辑题以后，现在做LSAT，发现很大的困难。特别是阅读方面，让我觉得非常吃力。请看下面这个题目，我连题目都没有看懂，让我怎么做呀。愤怒中！！！

14. The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market
crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. Careful examination of
the monthly figures on the causes of death in 1929 shows that the
number of suicides in October and in November was comparatively low. In
only three other months were the monthly figures lower. During the
summer months, when the stock market was flourishing, the number of
suicides was substantially higher.

Which one of the following, if true, would best challenge the conclusion of the passage?

读到这个地方，问题问的时候如果挑战结论。可是文章的结论是什么呀？是第一句话吗？说这个“suicide wave”很legend？我怎么去反对一个这么抽象的结论呀？奇怪！

(A) The suicide rate is influenced by many psychological,
interpersonal, and societal factors during any given historical period.

(B) October and November have almost always had relatively high suicide rates, even during the 1920s and 1930s.

(C) The suicide rate in October and November of 1929 was considerably
higher than the average for those months during several preceding and
following years.

(D) During the years surrounding the stock market crash, suicide rates
were typically lower at the beginning of any calendar year than toward
the end of that year.

(E) Because of seasonal differences, the number of suicides in October
and November of 1929 would not be expected to be the same as those for
other months.

作者: dreadpower 时间: 2004-4-7 22:42

文章的结论是： The “suicide wave” that followed the United States stock market
crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact

后面的全是evidence

我觉得你可能主要是阅读问题，慢慢来，熟悉了就好了，熟能生巧

作者: dxwei2008 时间: 2004-4-7 22:49
既然文章的结论我没有找错，那这个结论是什么意思呀？我看了老半天不知道这句话到底是什么意思。仍然愤怒中~~~

作者: dreadpower 时间: 2004-4-7 23:01

跟随于1929年10月美国股市暴跌之后的自杀风潮更多的是传奇而非事实

做题目最忌讳愤怒。。。静下心来，慢慢看。。。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)