ChaseDream

标题: prep1-第98题 [打印本页]

作者: linshigong    时间: 2010-4-4 14:32
标题: prep1-第98题
98.    (32682-!-item-!-188;#058&006783)    (GWD 28-Q29)

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted.  Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.  Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.  However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.  Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.

The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

A. Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.
B. There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in Lake Konfa.
C. The bottom of the lake does not contain toxic remnants of earlier pollution that will be stirred into the water by pipeline construction.
D. Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.
E. The species of fish that are present in Lake Konfa now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.


答案是C

请问A和B为什么错了?
作者: coolhaoming    时间: 2010-4-5 01:12
相对来说,C取非后非常明显地削弱了题干
作者: yinyin90122    时间: 2011-7-11 00:11
这个题我选的是B。。因为我觉得措施的关键是内个technology会不会让污染物泄漏爱。。求高人指点~~~
作者: rikihsu    时间: 2011-7-11 08:44
我也错选了B诶。后来我看到有人说是因为那个BELIEVE不对。。
作者: yinyin90122    时间: 2011-7-11 11:11
标题: 为神马believe不对类
为神马类?。。削弱不够强哞O.O




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3