标题: 大全I-18 为什么是A [打印本页] 作者: nymphl 时间: 2010-3-31 05:23 标题: 大全I-18 为什么是A 大全-Ⅰ-18.Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point out that since 1987, revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees attended consultant-led seminars were lower than revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees did not attend such seminars. The critics charge that for vacuum cleaner companies, the sales seminars are ill conceived and a waste of money.
Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to the critics of sales seminars?
(A) Those vacuum cleaner companies whose sales were highest prior to 1987 are the only companies that did not send employees to the seminars.
(B) Vacuum cleaner companies that have sent employees to sales seminars since 1987 experienced a greater drop in sales than they had prior to 1987.
(C) The cost of vacuum cleaner sales seminars run by outside consultants has risen dramatically since 1987.
(D) The poor design of vacuum cleaner sales seminars is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness.(A)
(E) Since 1987, sales of vacuum cleaners have risen twenty percent. 作者: coolhaoming 时间: 2010-3-31 07:53
外部咨询机构说:自从1987,参加咨询机构会议的公司收入比不参加的公司收入低。因此这些会议浪费钱。 问削弱 A在1987年之前收入最高的公司是唯一不参加会议的公司。因此在1987之后,参加会议和不参加的公司对比双方组成是不均衡的,因为还包括之前收入最高的公司,因此不能说明会议不好。 对这个题理解不是太深,只能给楼主个思路,望大牛指点作者: hughlv 时间: 2010-3-31 10:19
这道题需要理解的是什么样的公司会派人参加这样的sales seminars。A很犀利的指出,那些本来销售就很好的公司没必要派人参加这种sales seminar,参加的都是销售有问题的公司。