标题: ！！求助一道逻辑题 [打印本页] 作者: mummykiss 时间: 2010-3-28 23:44 标题: ！！求助一道逻辑题 Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies. B. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by that evidence. C. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion. D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. E. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 请问到底怎么区分EVIDENCE 和CONCLUSION 呀？？？ 感激不尽作者: 山炮 时间: 2010-3-29 12:20
LZ, two boldfaced portions 你还是标注出来吧。。要不大家怎么回答呢》作者: mummykiss 时间: 2010-3-30 02:40
第一处BOLD ： top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness 第二处：They might well be overoptimistic