ChaseDream

标题: 【在线求助】一道分词修饰的问题(已更正答案,重新提问) OG12th--65 [打印本页]

作者: venus2elva    时间: 2010-3-26 15:32
标题: 【在线求助】一道分词修饰的问题(已更正答案,重新提问) OG12th--65
65. In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches,
the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building
parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise
six feet above the waterline and act as a buffer,
so that it absorbs the energy of crashing waves
and protecting the beaches.

(A) act as a buffer, so that it absorbs

(B) act like a buffer so as to absorb

(C) act as a buffer, absorbing

(D) acting as a buffer, absorbing

(E) acting like a buffer, absorb

选C。 我的问题是absorbing 有没有修饰主句主语的歧义呢? 感谢同学指教。
作者: sissizhx    时间: 2010-3-26 17:59
答案不是C么。。。
作者: yaoxiayi    时间: 2010-3-26 21:53
同上~我也觉得选C~
作者: yahoochao    时间: 2010-3-26 22:27
LZ对错答案了~~O(∩_∩)O~OG上的答案就是c
作者: Eileenl    时间: 2010-3-26 22:31
同意 选C
作者: venus2elva    时间: 2010-3-26 22:57
啊哦, sorry,是对错答案了,我想问的是absorbing and protecting是修饰 rocks 吧?但是会不会有修饰句子主语the Army Corps of Engineers 的歧义的问题? 感谢楼上四位热心的同学
作者: ozymendias    时间: 2010-6-13 14:20
是不是absorbing作伴随结果就不需要考虑其逻辑主语啦,只有当作伴随动作的时候才要考虑是哪个主语发出的,求证。
作者: blvicky    时间: 2010-6-13 15:20
65. In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches,
the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building
parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise
six feet above the waterline and act as a buffer,
so that it absorbs the energy of crashing waves
and protecting the beaches.

(A) act as a buffer, so that it absorbs

(B) act like a buffer so as to absorb

(C) act as a buffer, absorbing

(D) acting as a buffer, absorbing

(E) acting like a buffer, absorb

选C。 我的问题是absorbing 有没有修饰主句主语的歧义呢? 感谢同学指教。
-- by 会员 venus2elva (2010/3/26 15:32:15)



我觉得没可能absorbing会修饰the Army Corps。一,the Army Corps absort ...完全句意不对,二,从GMAT的modifier的角度来看,absorbing是修饰紧接其前的句子,前面句子的解释、意思延伸的作用。所以应该是修饰a breakwater of rocks that would act as a buffer的。另一方面从GMAT的modifier考点来看的话,modifier离the Army Corps有多远够多远,不可能是GMAT句子的风格。如果硬要改成GMAT风格的话,我认为是应该是这样的了:
Absorbing the energy of crashing waves and protecting the beaches, the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building
parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise。这个句子句意完全不对了。
six feet above the waterline and act as a buffer
作者: 云南    时间: 2010-7-15 18:26
另外,从平行结构出发,absorbing 和 protecting平行,共同修饰rocks
作者: 安静的小兔    时间: 2010-9-23 10:26
这里 absorbing 和 protecting 怎么是修饰ROCK? 应该修饰最近的buffer 吧?
有点糊涂了, 还是修饰 building???
作者: crazysalad    时间: 2011-10-10 12:27
这道题无须考虑修饰什么,就是伴随结果,不用考虑逻辑主语。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3