ChaseDream

标题: OG 164 [打印本页]

作者: srzhang 时间: 2004-4-4 04:40
标题: OG 164

164. The commission proposed that funding for the park's development, which could be open to the public early next year. is obtained through a local bond issue.

(A) that funding for the park's development, which could be open to the public early next year, is

(B) that funding for development of the park, which could be open to the public early next year, be

(C) funding for the development of the park, perhaps open to the public early next year, to be

(D) funds for the park's development, perhaps open to the public early next year, be

(E) development funding for the park, which could be open to the public early next year, is to be

Choice B is best. Choice A attaches the relative clause which could be open ... to the noun development, when, in fact, it is the park that could be open. Choice C omits that, the object of proposed that is needed to introduce the clause describing the proposal. C also uses to be unidiomatically where be is correct: the commission proposed [that] funding ... to be obtained is wrong. Choice D incorrectly uses perhaps open to

the public ... to modify development; the phrase should modify park. Choice E, which seriously distorts meaning, says that the commission proposed development funding and that such funding could be open to the public ....

为什么鬼子解释选项E中的WHICH引导的非限定性从句修饰FUNDING而非PARK呢，而前面几个选项都是就近修饰之前的名词。郁闷中....请指教！

作者: ecsniffer 时间: 2004-4-4 10:38

很值得讨论的问题!

但是我对整个E的解释都不明白

Choice E, which seriously distorts meaning, says that the commission proposed development funding and that such funding could be open to the public....

和srzhang一样，尤其对such funding could be open to the public....

大家看看！

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-4 10:38:00编辑过]

作者: srzhang 时间: 2004-4-5 01:34

UP！！！！！！！！！！！

作者: srzhang 时间: 2004-4-6 02:34

怎没人理呢，赏个脸，各位XDJM，谢啦谢啦！！！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)