标题: 求助 xdf小蓝 削弱3 [打印本页] 作者: 101rose 时间: 2010-3-4 22:38 标题: 求助 xdf小蓝 削弱3 The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year.But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government's huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines? A The government has made little attempt to reduce the budget deficit. B The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth. C The value of the dollar declined several times in the year prior to the recent prediction of slower economic growth. D Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused declines in the dollar's value. E When there is a large budget deficit, other events in addition to predictions of slower economic growth sometimes trigger declines in currency value. 答案是D,可是我觉得C也可以削弱啊，难得是因为没有提到budget deficit?求NN帮忙~作者: beijin111 时间: 2010-3-9 19:01
我也是菜鸟，说说我的想法，楼主参考下即可，还是等牛牛来解答 按照lawyer的分类，我认为这题是条件型结论，条件：不是赤字，结果：不反过来影响dollar，即条件：赤字，结果：贬值。要weaken可显示充分条件成立但必要条件可以不成立，D就是说的有贬值但没赤字。结论讲的是贬值和赤字的关系而C没提到赤字作者: 水色青空 时间: 2010-4-8 20:44
同问，有没有人能说说这题目的意思啊？。。谢谢