ChaseDream

标题: GWD-8-Q11 [打印本页]

作者: cannahere    时间: 2010-3-4 12:15
标题: GWD-8-Q11
Thereare no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfishthat can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion throughoverfishing.
A.There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size ofmonkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletionthrough overfishing.
B.There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlikecod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because theyare being overfished.
C.There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, butnot for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.
D.Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish,which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.
E.Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catchingmonkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.


请问A里的a circumstance是啥成分?具体指什么?


作者: JayNicholas    时间: 2010-3-4 22:01
这个是同位语  起到解释前面句子的作用
作者: cannahere    时间: 2010-3-4 23:41
这个是同位语  起到解释前面句子的作用
-- by 会员 JayNicholas (2010/3/4 22:01:46)

谢谢

也就是说,同位语不仅可以做名词的同位语,也可以做句子的同位语?
作者: TeamCancer    时间: 2010-3-5 06:21
我觉得是省略了which is的非限制性定语从句
作者: cannahere    时间: 2010-3-5 10:04
我觉得是省略了which is的非限制性定语从句
-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/3/5 6:21:55)


which修饰靠近的名词,这样的话不就不对了么?
作者: TeamCancer    时间: 2010-3-5 14:02
修饰the whole sentence ya

我觉得是省略了which is的非限制性定语从句
-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/3/5 6:21:55)


which修饰靠近的名词,这样的话不就不对了么?
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/5 10:04:19)

作者: salasbond    时间: 2010-3-5 14:10
A中的语序是是不是可以调整如下?

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size ofmonkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletionthrough overfishing.

There are no legal limits on the size ofmonkfish that can be caught, as for cod and haddock there are a circumstance that contributes to their depletionthrough overfishing.
作者: cannahere    时间: 2010-3-6 01:53
A中的语序是是不是可以调整如下?

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size ofmonkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletionthrough overfishing.

There are no legal limits on the size ofmonkfish that can be caught, as for cod and haddock there are a circumstance that contributes to their depletionthrough overfishing.
-- by 会员 salasbond (2010/3/5 14:10:01)


有点懂了,这么看来这题还是很难的
作者: TeamCancer    时间: 2010-3-6 06:23
不能,我觉得原句的意思是,没有像鳕鱼和黑线鳕鱼那样有关于捕捞尺寸的法律保护是安康鱼被过度捕捞的原因之一

A中的语序是是不是可以调整如下?

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size ofmonkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletionthrough overfishing.

There are no legal limits on the size ofmonkfish that can be caught, as for cod and haddock there are a circumstance that contributes to their depletionthrough overfishing.
-- by 会员 salasbond (2010/3/5 14:10:01)

作者: cannahere    时间: 2010-3-6 11:24
不能,我觉得原句的意思是,没有像鳕鱼和黑线鳕鱼那样有关于捕捞尺寸的法律保护是安康鱼被过度捕捞的原因之一

A中的语序是是不是可以调整如下?

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size ofmonkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletionthrough overfishing.

There are no legal limits on the size ofmonkfish that can be caught, as for cod and haddock there are a circumstance that contributes to their depletionthrough overfishing.
-- by 会员 salasbond (2010/3/5 14:10:01)
-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/3/6 6:23:02)



那 a circumstance 到底指啥喂。。。
作者: salasbond    时间: 2010-3-7 13:19
我认为Tcancer 说的不对....
作者: cannahere    时间: 2010-3-7 23:43
晕了。。
牛牛都去哪里了。。虎年都不出来了哇
作者: TeamCancer    时间: 2010-3-8 08:52
指no legal  limits on size


那 a circumstance 到底指啥喂。。。
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/6 11:24:01)

作者: cannahere    时间: 2010-3-8 09:00
指no legal  limits on size

那 a circumstance 到底指啥喂。。。
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/6 11:24:01)
-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/3/8 8:52:18)


那么同位语就是可以指一句话的,对么
作者: TeamCancer    时间: 2010-3-9 00:04
问题就在这里,我记得同位语是不能修饰整句的

另外我觉得那个改变语序的不对,这个circumstance应该说的是安康的depletion,而不是鳕鱼

指no legal  limits on size

那 a circumstance 到底指啥喂。。。
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/6 11:24:01)
-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/3/8 8:52:18)


那么同位语就是可以指一句话的,对么
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/8 9:00:04)

作者: cannahere    时间: 2010-3-9 03:46
问题就在这里,我记得同位语是不能修饰整句的

另外我觉得那个改变语序的不对,这个circumstance应该说的是安康的depletion,而不是鳕鱼

指no legal  limits on size

那 a circumstance 到底指啥喂。。。
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/6 11:24:01)
-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/3/8 8:52:18)


那么同位语就是可以指一句话的,对么
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/8 9:00:04)
-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/3/9 0:04:29)


汗,。。那我实在不懂了
作者: wangjialei    时间: 2010-9-3 19:05
问题就在这里,我记得同位语是不能修饰整句的

另外我觉得那个改变语序的不对,这个circumstance应该说的是安康的depletion,而不是鳕鱼

指no legal  limits on size

那 a circumstance 到底指啥喂。。。
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/6 11:24:01)

-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/3/8 8:52:18)



那么同位语就是可以指一句话的,对么
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/8 9:00:04)

-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/3/9 0:04:29)



汗,。。那我实在不懂了
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/9 3:46:48)



楼主,可以负责任的告诉你,同位语本身是不可以修饰句子的,只可以修饰相近的名词,但是,当我们在表述一句话的时候,为了避免代词的指代不清,经常用一个概括性的词汇来概括前面所叙述的事情,这是代词指代问题,而不是同位语,虽然看起来像,你完全可以参考白勇的《语法全解》代词一章和3M的PREP语法精解,这类的表达方式真是不胜枚举了。

比如:一句话,前面叙述的是一个天文学的新发现,然后紧接着,a discovery that.......
         一句话,前面叙述一个考古学的新发现,紧接着,a finding that。。。。。
作者: hanlei8492    时间: 2010-9-28 19:32
问题就在这里,我记得同位语是不能修饰整句的

另外我觉得那个改变语序的不对,这个circumstance应该说的是安康的depletion,而不是鳕鱼

指no legal  limits on size

那 a circumstance 到底指啥喂。。。
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/6 11:24:01)


-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/3/8 8:52:18)




那么同位语就是可以指一句话的,对么
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/8 9:00:04)


-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/3/9 0:04:29)




汗,。。那我实在不懂了
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/9 3:46:48)




楼主,可以负责任的告诉你,同位语本身是不可以修饰句子的,只可以修饰相近的名词,但是,当我们在表述一句话的时候,为了避免代词的指代不清,经常用一个概括性的词汇来概括前面所叙述的事情,这是代词指代问题,而不是同位语,虽然看起来像,你完全可以参考白勇的《语法全解》代词一章和3M的PREP语法精解,这类的表达方式真是不胜枚举了。

比如:一句话,前面叙述的是一个天文学的新发现,然后紧接着,a discovery that.......
         一句话,前面叙述一个考古学的新发现,紧接着,a finding that。。。。。
-- by 会员 wangjialei (2010/9/3 19:05:11)



有点明白了,这个解释的好。
所以说,a circumstance是同位了前面的一整句话,而不是对应Limits是么?
否则一开始排除A选项,是因为我觉得如果是同位语对应Limits,应该用Circumstances
求高手彻底帮助拜托疑惑。
作者: 像风一样离去    时间: 2011-5-15 10:29
对话好多啊。
作者: cynthia628    时间: 2011-8-1 22:31
不能,我觉得原句的意思是,没有像鳕鱼和黑线鳕鱼那样有关于捕捞尺寸的法律保护是安康鱼被过度捕捞的原因之一

A中的语序是是不是可以调整如下?

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size ofmonkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletionthrough overfishing.

There are no legal limits on the size ofmonkfish that can be caught, as for cod and haddock there are a circumstance that contributes to their depletionthrough overfishing.
-- by 会员 salasbond (2010/3/5 14:10:01)

-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/3/6 6:23:02)




那 a circumstance 到底指啥喂。。。
-- by 会员 cannahere (2010/3/6 11:24:01)

作句末同位语,指对可捕鱼数量没有法律限制这种情况。
作者: luowen6    时间: 2011-8-1 22:49
同位语有三种结构
1.名词性同位语,n,n;n,a+n形式
2.that引导同位语从句(抽象名词具体化,如fact,result等)
3.概括性同位语结构,用一个名词概括前面的解释对象,如a program,a practice等
这里应该就是第三种吧~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3