ChaseDream

标题: 【求助GWD一道逻辑题谢谢!~】 [打印本页]

作者: 水色青空    时间: 2010-3-3 21:43
标题: 【求助GWD一道逻辑题谢谢!~】
Q32: TTGWD2-Q28:
Fearing competition from stores that rent video games for home use, owners of stores that sell video games lobbied for protective legislation.  Citing as a precedent legislation that postpones home film rentals until one year after general release to theaters, the video sellers proposed as an equitable solution a plan that would postpone rental of any video game until it had been available for sale for one year.
Which of the following, if true, would support an objection by owners of video rental stores that the fairness of the proposed legislation is not supported by the precedent cited?
A. Although the daily rental fee for home use of films is generally the same as that for video games, the average rental period for a video game is longer than that for a film.
B. Film rentals for home use tend to particularly strong during the first year after a film has been made available for both sale and rental at video rental stores.
C. Most people are interested in playing only the latest video games and tend to find video games that have been available for over a year unappealing whether they have played them before or not, whereas films maintain their appeal far longer after their release.
D. People who rent video games tend to play them by themselves, whereas people who rent films invite friends and neighbors to watch.
E. A slight decline in revenues from films that have been recently released in theaters has been attributed to the growing market for rentals of films for home use.










    不太明白题目的推理过程,能否大致解释一下题目的意思?谢谢NN们~~~答案选C~
作者: 水色青空    时间: 2010-3-3 21:52
顶~
作者: fiaoyaya    时间: 2010-3-3 22:14
这道题目C的推理过程:因为films在theaters放映1年以后大家还会感兴趣,所以租电影的业务并不会因为此项regulation而减少,但是video game就不一样了。因为在它release 1年以后,大家对它就没什么兴趣了,那么这项regulation大大减少出租video game的店的生意,因此文中所说的regulation对于这些店主来说打击会很大,因此对他们来说不公平。
作者: 水色青空    时间: 2010-3-4 15:47
这道题目C的推理过程:因为films在theaters放映1年以后大家还会感兴趣,所以租电影的业务并不会因为此项regulation而减少,但是video game就不一样了。因为在它release 1年以后,大家对它就没什么兴趣了,那么这项regulation大大减少出租video game的店的生意,因此文中所说的regulation对于这些店主来说打击会很大,因此对他们来说不公平。
-- by 会员 fiaoyaya (2010/3/3 22:14:48)





不好意思,你能不能大致说一下题目的意思?我没有看太明白这题目~
作者: 水色青空    时间: 2010-3-7 16:12
明白了~文章用了类比,游戏带销售商为了保证公平,要求游戏带出租商像电影带出租商一样在游戏出了一年后才能出租,这样来保证公平,原题的削弱题,也就是说这样的要求是不公平的。
选项说,因为玩游戏的人只对近期的游戏感兴趣,所以当游戏出来卖了一年后,已经没人想租了,所以对出租商不公平~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3