ChaseDream

标题: 大全-A-4 [打印本页]

作者: JerryGuan    时间: 2004-4-2 02:10
标题: 大全-A-4

4.     At one time, European and Japanese companies tried to imitate their American rivals. Today, American appliance manufacturers import European scientists to lead their research staffs; American automakers design cars that mimic the styling of German, Italian, and French imports; and American electronics firms boast in their advertising of “Japanese-style” devotion to quality and reliability. In the world of high technology, America has lost the battle for international prestige.

Each of the following statements, if true, would help to support the claim above EXCEPT:

(A) An American camera company claims in its promotional literature to produce cameras “as fine as the best Swiss imports.”

(B) An American maker of stereo components designs its products to resemble those of a popular Japanese firm.

(C) An American manufacturer of video games uses a brand name chosen because it sounds like a Japanese word.



(D) An American maker of televisions studies German-made televisions in order to adopt German manufacturing techniques.E

(E) An American maker of frozen foods advertises its dinners as “Real European-style entrees prepared by fine French and Italian chefs.”





答案E,我选C

文中有advertising的内容,不正好与E相对应嘛,为什么不是加强呢? 相反C说,“只是取一个叫起来像日本单词的商标”,这和广告差的远呢,如何判断它是加强了文意?



作者: dansy    时间: 2004-4-2 11:18
题干说欧洲和日本原先都喜欢模仿美国的产品。现在分水轮流转了,然后举了一些例子。最后结论说在高科技领域,美国已经失去了它原有的特别地位。题目问哪个选项不支持这个结论。 E说的是食品方面的东西,和科技产品是不同的。所以E为答案。而C说的正是美国在电子产品方面造成一个日本商标的假象,这正是支持了题干结论。
作者: sammaijgd    时间: 2005-9-3 17:46
这题我做了,两边,都错了,郁闷
作者: openmind    时间: 2005-10-28 07:53
dansy真是NN
作者: amber0919    时间: 2006-3-26 14:08
问题不在于是不是科技还是食品.而在于E说的是产品本身,而不在于模仿
作者: 当当84    时间: 2006-6-6 12:02
以下是引用amber0919在2006-3-26 14:08:00的发言:
问题不在于是不是科技还是食品.而在于E说的是产品本身,而不在于模仿

我也有看到类似这样的解释的,但是不是很懂,可不可以解释清楚一点?谢谢


作者: cattsky    时间: 2006-8-28 17:16
瞎了瞎了
作者: 晴天小狗    时间: 2006-10-11 10:01

求正解!

不会是因为E选项 food不是高科技吧?

这叫逻辑题么


作者: yogaII    时间: 2006-10-11 12:11
问题是那些选项不支持原观点: In the world of high technology, America has lost the battle for international prestige.

food 不是
high tech, 所以不能支持原观点.
怎么不算逻辑题呢?

作者: 晴天小狗    时间: 2006-10-11 13:40
谢谢
作者: feizhuliu    时间: 2007-9-14 22:42
以下是引用yogaII在2006-10-11 12:11:00的发言:
问题是那些选项不支持原观点: In the world of high technology, America has lost the battle for international prestige.

food 不是
high tech, 所以不能支持原观点.
怎么不算逻辑题呢?

豁然开朗


作者: jtcoffeebean    时间: 2007-9-14 23:36

我觉得不仅仅是因为是food还是tech这个层面,

而是本质上在于E中直接指明是出自非American之手,而无论题中还是其他选项只是说像其他国家的产品一样质优:

4. At one time, European and Japanese companies tried to imitate their American
                
rivals. Today, American appliance manufacturers import European scientists to lead their research staffs; American automakers design cars that mimic the styling of German, Italian, and French imports; and American electronics firms boast in their advertising of “Japanese-style” devotion to quality and reliability. In the world of high technology, America has lost the battle for international prestige.

        

Each of the following statements, if true, would help to support the claim above EXCEPT:
        

(A) An American camera company claims in its promotional literature to produce cameras “as fine as the best Swiss imports.”
        

(B) An American maker of stereo components designs its products to resemble those of a popular Japanese firm.
        

(C) An American manufacturer of video games uses a brand name chosen because it sounds like a Japanese word.

(D) An American maker of televisions studies German-made televisions in order to adopt German manufacturing techniques.

(E) An American maker of frozen foods advertises its dinners as “Real European-style entrees prepared by fine French and Italian chefs.”

还有,以后EXCEPT题最好从E看起哦~~


作者: jtcoffeebean    时间: 2007-9-15 01:22
不好意思重新想了一下,还是自己思维错误了,把题作为类比题作了,其实是支持题,densy的原解是正确的,abcd支持了上文最后一句结论!
作者: ambrosecelin    时间: 2008-2-26 09:23
我同意tcoffeebean的解释~
作者: jonathan1987    时间: 2008-9-24 22:15

作者: 璇璇淘    时间: 2009-3-7 10:52

两种角度的解释都不错!


作者: 北极虾仁    时间: 2009-7-31 00:02
不明白




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3