标题: 请教feifei logic [打印本页] 作者: gmatziyu 时间: 2010-2-21 17:03 标题: 请教feifei logic 21. Historian: We can learn about the medical history of individuals through chemical analysis of their hair. It is likely, for example, that Isaac Newton’s psychological problems were due to mercury poisoning; traces of mercury were found in his hair. Analysis is now being done on a lock of Beethoven’s hair. Although no convincing argument has shown that Beethoven ever had a venereal disease, some people hypothesize that venereal disease caused his deafness. Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven’s time to treat venereal disease, if researchers find a trace of mercury in his hair, we can conclude that this hypothesis is correct.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the historian’s argument depends?
A.None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated. B.Some people in Beethoven’s time did not ingest mercury. C.Mercury is an effective treatment for venereal disease. D.Mercury poisoning can cause deafness in people with venereal disease. E.Beethoven suffered from psychological problems of the same severity as Newton ’s. 请问这道题为什么选B呢？谢谢作者: 果汁软糖 时间: 2010-2-22 22:20
There should be 2 assumptions to support the hypothesis. The 1st assumption of the author is that only venereal disease will be treated by mercury in Beethoven’s time. The 2nd assumption is only some people in Beethoven's time will ingest mercury, if all people ingest mercury, the evidence is not useful. So, some people in Beethoven's time did not ingest mercury. The answer should be B.
A, E have nothing to do with the argument. C is not necessary, 'Since mercury was commonly ingested in Beethoven’s time to treat venereal disease' is enough. D is wrong: according to the author, it is the venereal disease that will cause the deafness, not the mercury poison.作者: mycontrol01 时间: 2010-2-23 12:11
其实是要证明没有其他途径可以让mercury进入人的身体
