标题: prep 1-71(关于many的困惑） [打印本页] 作者: dontwannalose 时间: 2010-2-15 00:51 标题: prep 1-71(关于many的困惑） 71. In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money. However, many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's argument? (A) Many workers who have already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs. (B) Many corporations that have failed to automate have seen their profits decline. (C) Taxes and unemployment insurance are paid also by corporations that are not automating. (D) Most of the new jobs created by automation pay less than the jobs eliminated by automation did. (E) The initial investment in machinery for automation is often greater than the short-term savings in labor costs.
这道题的正确答案是A，用排除法可以得到改选项没错，但是该选项中出现了`many`，在OG12及其补充材料中出现该字眼的题目似乎都是错的，因为该词体现了部分性没有体现整体性 所以我在想，是不是CR和SC一样，都是在找一个想比较而言最好的答案呢？ 想听听大家的看法？ 谢拉作者: mofell 时间: 2011-2-28 22:36
同问 请教一下！作者: chasingM7 时间: 2011-3-1 01:05
A makes perfect sense. If laidoff workers can find jobs, the insurance and unemployment shouldn't increase. But if they cannot find jobs, they the argument makes perfect sense作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2011-3-1 11:44
Many should change to MOST.