ChaseDream

标题: 请教一题 [打印本页]

作者: superapollo    时间: 2004-3-31 11:41
标题: 请教一题
the price the     government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called "historical costing".historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase,based on the current rate of inflation,to the previous year's contractual price .


which of following statement ,if true,is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method of military contrators?


答案是A     the government might continue to pay for     past inefficient use of funds.


怎么解释呀?谢谢


作者: philikittist    时间: 2004-3-31 12:30
能把别的选项贴出来吗?


我理解的passage的意思是:政府通过补偿通胀来保护军火商的利益。


问题是:那个选项可以说明这种定价方法不好?


我觉得这种方法的不好在于:虽然价格是去年的,但成本也是去年发生的,通胀对成本应该没有影响,所以政府的补偿,是由政府来对资金使用的无效率买单。


不好意思,完全是根据答案倒推的,还是看看全部选项比较好。


作者: weiyu    时间: 2004-3-31 16:20
过去的cost不是sound, 现在也不会sound
作者: superapollo    时间: 2004-4-1 23:07
呵,谢谢两位。
作者: 费希    时间: 2004-4-1 23:53
我觉得 OG上的解释挺清楚的




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3