标题: CXD逻辑第2篇第7章全真试题精练及解析第40题,N哥请进!√ [打印本页] 作者: gedn01 时间: 2010-2-12 15:07 标题: CXD逻辑第2篇第7章全真试题精练及解析第40题,N哥请进!√ Any announcement authorized by the head of the department is important. However, announcements are sometimes issued, without authorization, by people other than the head of the department, so some announcements will inevitably turn out not to be important. The reasoning is flawed because the argument (A) does not specify exactly which communications are to be classified as announcements (B) overlooks the possibility that people other than the head of the department have the authority to authorize announcements (C) leaves open the possibility that the head of the department never, in fact, authorizes any announcements (D) assumes without warrant that just because satisfying a given condition is enough to ensure an announcement's importance, satisfying that condition is necessary for its importance (E) fails to distinguish between the importance of the position someone holds and the importance of what that person may actually be announcing on a particular occasion
题目内容很简单，好理解。答案（D）.但我认为可以考虑选项E,因为Any announcement authorized by the head of the department is important.没有说明是"通知重要"还是"部门头头签发的这个举动重要"。E正好指出了它的问题所在作者: hughlv 时间: 2010-2-12 16:31
题目并不是让我们去质疑这句话的正确性：Any announcement authorized by the head of the department is important. 而是基于这句话是正确的前提，后面的推理过程中包含了什么问题。作者: gedn01 时间: 2010-2-12 17:16
题目并不是让我们去质疑这句话的正确性. 题目也没有说啊作者: gedn01 时间: 2010-2-13 11:31
up作者: hughlv 时间: 2010-2-13 23:35
reasoning题的基本结构是：原始依据A --> 推断过程 --> 作者结论B。问题是基于A是否可以得出B，而不是A本身是否有问题。我们的分析重点应该是在推断的步骤中，因为问题是the reasoning is flawed because ...，若希望你质疑A的话那我觉得应该是the statement is flawed because ...。个人愚见。作者: gedn01 时间: 2010-2-14 16:29
明白！