标题: 不明白解释。。。 [打印本页] 作者: kingstorm666 时间: 2010-2-6 15:44 标题: 不明白解释。。。 13. A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future. (A) that they will, or could, (B) that they would, or could, (C) they will be or could (D) think that they will be or could (E) think the power stations would or could In choice E, “would” is faulty because it suggests without warrant that the stations would be made safe if some unnamed conditions were met. 为什么？？？？？？什么意思作者: miachi871012 时间: 2010-2-6 15:56
用would的话就会产生conditional的效果，就是说核电站在满足某种条件conditions下才会安全。然而原句是没有这个意味。