ChaseDream

标题: OG12-107 which的指代 [打印本页]

作者: Jennifer789 时间: 2010-2-5 10:34
标题: OG12-107 which的指代
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a
technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which
can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost
any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in
medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

A.原题

B. A technique originally developed for detecting
air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray
emission, which can quickly analyze the
chemical elements in almost any substance
without destroying it,

想问为什么A中的which可以跳跃修饰a technical 但是B中的which却只能就近修饰emmision呢？？谢谢！！

作者: prayer 时间: 2010-2-5 10:44

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a
technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which
can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost
any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in
medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

A.原题

B. A technique originally developed for detecting
air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray
emission, which can quickly analyze the
chemical elements in almost any substance
without destroying it,

想问为什么A中的which可以跳跃修饰a technical 但是B中的which却只能就近修饰emmision呢？？谢谢！！

-- by 会员 Jennifer789 (2010/2/5 10:34:41)

因为B里的which与a technique之间多了一个句子，就近修饰，所以只能修饰插入的那个句子。虽然你知道是修饰a technique，但是两个定语都放在后面，就容易产生混乱。

作者: Jennifer789 时间: 2010-2-5 10:59
哦哦谢谢！

作者: abby666666 时间: 2010-2-5 15:58
为什么A中的which可以跳跃修饰a technical?

作者: mycontrol01 时间: 2010-2-6 23:59
更正！A中which不是修饰的TECHNICAL 而是修饰的proton-induced X-ray emission！

不然 TECHNICAL怎么analyze?!

作者: mycontrol01 时间: 2010-2-7 00:01
OG的解释也是 which修饰的应该是proton-induced X-ray emission

作者: Jennifer789 时间: 2010-2-7 00:10
刚刚看了下好像是的那请问为什么OG解释B说 which错误地指代了emission呢？？混了。。。

作者: 红尘道士 时间: 2010-2-7 07:17
这个问题确实很迷惑

作者: abby666666 时间: 2010-2-7 11:45
那which有没有可以跳跃指代的性质呢？

作者: newca 时间: 2010-8-21 21:58
个人认为下面帖子中xfi883 NN的解释很有道理：
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-395276-1-1.html
尽管which都修饰emission

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)