Shanna: Owners of any work of art, simpy by virtue of ownership,ethically have the right to destroy that artwork if they find it morally or aesthetically distasteful, or if caring for it becomes inconvenient.
Jorge: Ownership of unique artworks ,unlike ownership of other kinds of objects carries the moral right to possess but not to destroy.A unique work of art with aesthetic or historical value belongs to posterity and so must be preserved, what ever the personal wishes of its legal owner.
On the basis of their statements, Shanna and Jorge are committed to disagreeing about the truth of which one of the following statements?
A Anyone who owns a portrait presenting his or her father in an unflattering light would for that reason alone be ethically justified in destroying it.
E It is legally permissible for a unique and historically valueable mural to be destroyed by its owner if h or she tires of it.
E为什么错呢，如果一个具有unique and historically valueable 的mural被它所有者破坏，Jorge肯定会反对呀，求教NN们，万谢！
-- by 会员 francoiswang (2010/1/31 16:33:49)