ChaseDream

标题: 一篇寂静 AA [打印本页]

作者: queenz    时间: 2010-1-31 13:15
标题: 一篇寂静 AA
Generally speaking, it is financially unwise for people quit stable office job and start working from home. It is there are a lot of distractions when people working from home. People working from home tend to procrastinate because there is no discipline. Also, working from home make people isolated. Therefore, it is financially more advantageous for people working in the office.
这篇好像是新的,有牛人知道有哪些攻击点吗?我找不出啊。。
作者: queenz    时间: 2010-1-31 14:25
救命啊!明天就考了。。着急。
作者: heyu1gsm    时间: 2010-1-31 15:53
标题: 抛砖
我能想到的:工作环境中也有很多干扰,比如说office gossip.
另外,在家工作不一定isolated,因为现在有很多新的telecommunication tools
作者: queenz    时间: 2010-1-31 17:34
攻击点好像少了点。。而且比较弱
作者: 我心向明月    时间: 2010-1-31 22:45
Generally speaking, it is financially unwise for people quit stable office job and start working from home. It is there are a lot of distractions when people working from home. People working from home tend to procrastinate because there is no discipline. Also, working from home make people isolated. Therefore, it is financially more advantageous for people working in the office.

没有讲到在家上班的好处?比如:上/下班时间是traffic最集中的时间,不需要在这上面空耗时间,当别人还在路上堵车时,你已经心情愉快地准备开始工作。当别人下班后,在严重的塞车中急勿勿往家里赶,你已经坐在家里,这会节省多少时间?还有节省多少交通成本?

供参考。
作者: queenz    时间: 2010-1-31 23:55
非常感谢!!!
作者: oh9527    时间: 2010-11-26 16:28
这片不大像AA,因为三个理由和结论毫无联系,第一句话跟最后一句矛盾。狗主人记错了吧,应该不会有这么弱的AA题目。
作者: rzheng08    时间: 2010-12-2 06:24
这个是AA的题 我考过
作者: 多多天下    时间: 2010-12-2 13:34
最重要一点,列举的理由都不足以证明Financially unwise这个论点,只是提到会有干扰,被isolated之类,完全没有从finance角度去分析家里工作收入会比办公室低




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3