标题: OG12-61求助 [打印本页] 作者: 飞行2010 时间: 2010-1-26 16:36 标题: OG12-61求助 61. Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement, the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China 's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete.
A. the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China 's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete.
B. Qin Shi Huang, China 's first emperor, was protected in his afterlife by an army of terra-cotta warriors that was created more than 2,000 years ago by 700,000 artisans who took more than 36 years to complete it.
C. it took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to create an army of terra-cotta warriors more than 2,000 years ago that would protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife.
D. more than 2,000 years ago, 700,000 artisans worked more than 36years to create an army of terra-cotta warriors to protect Qin Shi Huang, China 's first emperor, in his afterlife
E. more than 36 years were needed to complete the army of terra-cotta warriors that 700,000 artisans created 2,000 years ago to protect Qin Shi Huang, China's first emperor, in his afterlife
我选D,答案是A.我觉得D表达更主动些比A,而且语意也是合理的，为什么不对？谢谢大牛们作者: DIS 时间: 2010-1-26 17:20
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement的逻辑主语只能是 the army of terra-cotta warriors ，只有warriors才能和pyramids cities相比较作者: 论坛设施 时间: 2010-1-26 23:12
只能是A，比较对象要一致作者: 飞行2010 时间: 2010-1-27 17:14
恩，我忽略了那个问题了，谢谢你们。作者: Jasonhere 时间: 2010-3-4 23:05
Rivaling媲美的意思，其实通过后面也可看出，逻辑主语题作者: kernnel 时间: 2010-7-23 08:36
答案是A對
但是我覺得A根本少個動詞啊 the army of terra-cotta worriors was created to protect
不是應該要用被動嗎?作者: wangsiwei 时间: 2010-7-23 08:56
谓语动词是is，created后面那一串是用来形容兵马俑的，迷惑人的，作者: ConnieC 时间: 2010-8-25 20:37
Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement, the army of terra-cotta warriors
created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China’s fi rst emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans
more than 36 years to complete.
这里的and took是和谁并列啊？took在这里是不是谓语动词啊？
我觉得took的主语好像是the army of terra-cotta warriors ，但是is 也是系动词做谓语啊~那两个不一样时态的谓语可以并列？？作者: 安静的小兔 时间: 2010-9-23 10:08
took 这里是不是省略了 is???? 应该是和 is more than 2,000 yrs old 并列的作者: zzp123321 时间: 2010-9-24 04:41
took 这里是不是省略了 is???? 应该是和 is more than 2,000 yrs old 并列的
-- by 会员 安静的小兔 (2010/9/23 10:08:24)
我觉得这里没有省略is is more than 2000 years old and took 7000....是并列的 前者现在时表示陈述一种状态，一个事实，后者一般过去表示过去发生的事情作者: 勒勒和小雪糕 时间: 2012-3-28 09:18 我觉得这里没有省略is is more than 2000 years old and took 7000....是并列的 前者现在时表示陈述一种状态，一个事实，后者一般过去表示过去发生的事情
这种说法是对的~作者: yokohama 时间: 2015-7-17 17:06
知道rivaling意思后，我明白应该选｛army｝作主语。但是A中两两个谓语动词 is and took，时态可以不一致，我也是懂的。但是－－“army took 人／时间 to complete 自己？”－－，我想问一下不用考虑被动吗？ 难道不是｛工匠花了好几年去完成army吗？｝所以应该＝army是工匠花了好几年完成的？作者: fuuta 时间: 2016-5-2 16:45