标题: 请教一道kaplan得逻辑踢 [打印本页] 作者: crokfucrokfu 时间: 2010-1-22 06:03 标题: 请教一道kaplan得逻辑踢 A psychologist is treating a patient with multiple personality disorder. One of the patient ’ s personalities claims to be a blind Civil War veteran. When exhibiting this personality, the patient responds in the affirmative when asked, only in a written format, whether he is blind. None of the patient ’ s other personalities claims to be blind. The psychologist concluded that the patient ’ s personality is fragmented, and that the veteran personality claims to be blind, while another personality responds to the written question. Asking which of the following questions can reveal a flaw in the psychologist ’ s explanation?
1.Why does the personality that answers the written question not answer “ No ” ?
2.Why does the psychologist feel compelled to explain the patient ’ s responses?
3.Why doesn ’ t another of the patient ’ s personalities convince the veteran personality that he can see?
4.Why does the veteran personality claim to be blind, but none of the other personalities make this claim?
5.Why don ’ t all the patient ’ s personalities claim to be blind?
正确答案是1
我没看懂得地方是When exhibiting this personality, the patient responds in the affirmative when asked, only in a written format, whether he is blind. 这句话什么意思阿?谢谢!作者: clarry 时间: 2010-1-23 00:35
如果这为病人选的是No，那么表示他当时并不出在越南老兵的状态中。。是某种其他的人格在作答。所以1对。 lZ问的这句话的意思是： 当该病人显现出该人格并用书面的形式被问及他是否是盲人是。他的回答是肯定的。