ChaseDream

标题: 求救。PREP一道逻辑题，顿住了 [打印本页]

作者: michel211 时间: 2010-1-21 10:52
标题: 求救。PREP一道逻辑题，顿住了
59. (33759-!-item-!-188;#058&007597)

Bank depositors in the United States are all financially protected against bank failure because the government insures all individuals' bank deposits. An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failures, since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that holds their money is secure against failure. If depositors were more selective, then banks would need to be secure in order to compete for depositors' money.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the economist's argument?

(A) Before the government started to insure depositors against bank failure, there was a lower rate of bank failure than there is now.

(B) When the government did not insure deposits, frequent bank failures occurred as a result of depositors' fears of losing money in bank failures.

(C) Surveys show that a significant proportion of depositors are aware that their deposits are insured by the government.

(D) There is an upper limit on the amount of an individual's deposit that the government will insure, but very few individuals' deposits exceed this limit.

(E) The security of a bank against failure depends on the percentage of its assets that are loaned out and also on how much risk its loans involve.

为什么选B呢，怎么理解啊？？

作者: gwinyu 时间: 2010-1-21 11:06
这题很好理解啊

经济学家说政府对存款人的保护导致很多银行关闭。如果存款人有更多选择，即不被insure的话，银行将会更安全以适应竞争。

B说如果政府不insure存款人，很多银行将倒闭。明显weaken

作者: michel211 时间: 2010-1-21 19:10
太感谢拉~~~~

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)