ChaseDream

标题: some SC questions,pls help me! [打印本页]

作者: britney_gao    时间: 2003-5-16 20:12
标题: some SC questions,pls help me!
1. it is oversimplified view of cattle raising to say that all one has to do with cattle is leave them alone while they feed themselves, corral them, and to drive them to market when the time is ripe.
a. 同上
b. all one has to do with cattle is to leave them alone to feed themselves, to corral them, and
c. all one has to do with cattle is leave them alone to feed themselves and then corral them and
d. the only thing that has to be done with cattle is leave them alone while they feed themselves, corral them, and
e. the only thing that has to be done with cattle is to leave them alone while they feed themselves, to corral them, and
正确答案是c。 我选d。 is 后面可以直接加leave吗? 我觉得应该是to leave吧? 还有 all one has to do with cattle里面已经有个谓语动词has了,那么后面的is 又是什么呢? 另外,all one thing 和 the only thing 的区别是什么呢?

2. oberlin college in ohio was a renegade institution at its 1833 founding for deciding to accept both men and women as students.
a. 同上
b. for the decision at its 1833 founding to accept
c. when it was founded in 1833 for its decision to accept
d. in deciding at its founding in 1833 to accept
e. by deciding at its founding in 1833 on the acceptance of
正确答案是d。我选的是c。 不明白为什么选d,因为后半部分明显是前面的原因,用for 引导不是很好?

3. rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increasinges in sales ,can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economics growth.
a. 同上
b. when not accompanied by correspondingly increases in sales, possibly leads
c. when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
d. if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
e. if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead
正确答案选e。如果不是因为d 后面的leads 错了, 我肯定选d。 我的问题是d 中correspondingly increased sales和e中corresponding increases in sales 有什么区别?如果d后面改为lead,d是不是更好一点?

4.research during the past several decades on the nature of language and the processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity.
a. 同上
b. of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
c. by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity.
d. by which it is produced and understood have revealed great complexity rather than underlying simplicity
e. by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
正确答案是a。我选的是c。a中processes that produce and make it understandable,  “过程”可以“产生语言的本质”吗?


谢谢


作者: 1stzhang    时间: 2003-5-16 22:46
1、这个题目有争议,你可以放弃。

2、当逻辑意思合理的情况下优先使用动词,所以C for its decision 不好!

3、correspondingly increased sales和e中corresponding increases in sales前者重点是sales后者是increase,你体会一下这两种修饰。如果d后面改为lead,d是不是更好一点?不是!
(1)correspondingly increased sales和rising inventories更加合理
(2)在有条件句的时候使用can,更加符合英语习惯。

4、这个题目的bde是比较好排除的,主要是ac的比较。在比较ac的时候,逻辑意思是大致相同主要是两个原因(1)it is produced and understood ,it指代不清,并且是不对的which指带the processes,也应该用they;(2)主动优于被动。

作者: britney_gao    时间: 2003-5-17 11:00
以下是引用1stzhang在2003-5-16 22:46:00的发言:
3、correspondingly increased sales和e中corresponding increases in sales前者重点是sales后者是increase,你体会一下这两种修饰。如果d后面改为lead,d是不是更好一点?不是!
(1)correspondingly increased sales和rising inventories更加合理
(2)在有条件句的时候使用can,更加符合英语习惯。

4、这个题目的bde是比较好排除的,主要是ac的比较。在比较ac的时候,逻辑意思是大致相同主要是两个原因(1)it is produced and understood ,it指代不清,并且是不对的which指带the processes,也应该用they;(2)主动优于被动。


我总觉得第3题中,inventories和sales 对称,所以感觉correspondingly increased sales和rising inventories更加合理
第4题中,我觉得it 指的应该是 nature of language. 如果说it 指代不清的话,那么A选项里面也有it 呀。另外,which 可以引导定语从句,而they 不可以。主要原因大概是“主动优于被动”?
作者: mike1999    时间: 2003-5-17 11:11
be to do这种结构to可以省略也可以不省略,只要记住要省全省,要么全部补全。
作者: 1stzhang    时间: 2003-5-17 13:17
第4题中,我觉得it 指的应该是 nature of language. 如果说it 指代不清的话,那么a选项里面也有it 呀。另外,which 可以引导定语从句,而they 不可以。主要原因大概是“主动优于被动”

which 就近修饰,by which 从语法上讲which是应该指带processes,所以正如你所讲是主动优于被动。"which 可以引导定语从句,而they 不可以另外"可能是你对我的表诉没有理解,我不是说让they引导句子。上次回答问题的时候我没有看清楚make后的的结构就武断地说是it 指代不清,不好意思!

第三个题目主要问题是lead/leads,其他的和你分析的一致,但要注意can /probably的区别。









[此贴子已经被作者于2003-5-17 13:27:19编辑过]

作者: britney_gao    时间: 2003-5-18 16:33
thanks mike and zhang.
btw,zhang, can you expalin the difference bettwen "can "and "possibly" in detail ?
作者: 1stzhang    时间: 2003-5-18 19:11
possibly表示“大概”,是一件事情可能发生 比如:It will probably rain.
can表示在有能力的基础上的可能性 比如:I can speak english.
其他方面必须从语气和上下文来体会,比如这个题目用了条件句if那么这个时候用can是比较合理的。请各位朋友补充,如果我看到这方面的资料我会及时补充。
作者: britney_gao    时间: 2003-5-19 11:03
thank zhang, you are really a good guy ;)




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3