标题: 请教一道题（狒狒test-7 124) [打印本页] 作者: 拾海 时间: 2010-1-14 09:01 标题: 请教一道题（狒狒test-7 124) It is repeatedly claimed that the dumping of nuclear waste poses no treat to people living nearby. If this claim could be made with certainty, there would be no reason for not locating sites in areas of dense population. But the policy of dumping nuclear waste only in the more sparsely populated regions indicates, at the very least, some misgiving about safety on the part of those responsible for policy.
Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument?
(A) Evacuation plants in the event of an accident could not be guaranteed to work perfectly except where the population is small.
(B) In the event of an accident, it is certain that fewer people would be harmed in a sparsely populated than in a densely populated area.
(C) Dumping of nuclear waste poses fewer economic and bureaucratic problems in sparsely populated than in densely populated areas.
(D) There are dangers associated with chemical waste, and it, too, is dumped away from areas of dense population.
(E) Until there is no shred of doubt that nuclear dumps are safe, it makes sense to situate them where they pose the least threat to the public.
好几个选项看起来都好像答案呃...
先谢过NN们指点呵作者: prayer 时间: 2010-1-14 15:47
the answer is c. as the passage suggests, the author thinks there must be considerations of safety in the choose of dumping places. So the answer should give another reason instead of that. A, B, D and E are all concerned about safety, and only c tell us that the shopping of places is out of a concern of cost .so C is the right answer.作者: prayer 时间: 2010-1-14 15:52
文章说的处理waste的安全性，在哪里倒垃圾的问题。 A:Evacuation plants in the event of an accident 说的事故的安全性； B：还是事故 D:chemical waste无关 E:跟在哪里倒垃圾无关