ChaseDream

标题: 新手求教,由GWD6-Q29引出的问题:何谓“原句” [打印本页]

作者: langrenly    时间: 2010-1-10 22:34
标题: 新手求教,由GWD6-Q29引出的问题:何谓“原句”
GWD6-Q29:
Authoritative parents are more likely than permissive parents to have children who as adolescents are self-confident, high in self-esteem, and responsibly independent.

A.        Authoritative parents are more likely than permissive parents to have children who as adolescents are self-confident, high in self-esteem, and responsibly independent.
B.        Authoritative parents who are more likely than permissive parents to have adolescent children that are self-confident, high in self-esteem, and responsibly independent.
C.        Children of authoritative parents, rather than permissive parents, are the more likely to be self-confident, have a high self-esteem, and to be responsibly independent as adolescents.
D.        Children whose parents are authoritative rather than being permissive, are more likely to have self-confidence, a high self-esteem, and be responsibly independent when they are an adolescent.
E.        Rather than permissive parents, the children of authoritative parents are the more likely to have self-confidence, a high self-esteem, and to be responsibly independent as an adolescent.
-----------------
很多答案上的解释都是说CDE项改变了原句的主语,从parents变成了children,可是这道题全句都是划线,正确答案才是原句,凭什么就说主语非得是parents呢?我觉得CDE的错误似乎是比较主体不一致才对。


包括白勇的很多道题解释也是某选项改变了原句的意思,可是正确答案明明就不是A,难道只有A才能是“原句”吗?

疑惑了很久的问题,希望各位兄弟姐妹解惑,谢谢
作者: xiaolishally    时间: 2010-1-11 22:15
只能总结出“整个句子划线的时候,要注意主语不要改变的原则

作者: 果汁软糖    时间: 2010-1-11 22:40
其实这题的逻辑还是挺明显的…… Authoritative parents 比 permissive parents 更容易培养出children who as adolescents are self-confident, high in self-esteem, and responsibly independent 不是么 而不是children who as adolescents are self-confident, high in self-esteem, and responsibly independent 更容易有
Authoritative parents ……
作者: fengshiming    时间: 2010-1-11 22:50
1L的,真是极品中的极品,有功夫多看看的帖子,GMAT能被你总结出这样,I 服了U!
作者: genieli    时间: 2010-1-12 01:14
我觉得你也可以看C,D,E中Than的用法,如果是并列的话应该有OF 的。CHILDREN OF X PARENTS THAN OF Y PARENTS ~~~~ 不知道我这个解释对不对
作者: 拾海    时间: 2010-1-12 11:31
3L何必挖苦人....大家都上来讨论,有不懂提早问清楚不是好事吗...
作者: langrenly    时间: 2010-1-12 22:28
感谢大家的指导!看了看大仙的“原句”解释,觉得挺有帮助。
顺便批评下三楼,辱骂与恐吓绝不是战斗,如果你觉得1楼总结的有问题,可以说你认为正确的总结嘛。
作者: supershuang    时间: 2014-11-8 03:47
B中的who也导致句子不完整




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3