标题: feifei 逻辑121 [打印本页] 作者: girlwithwings 时间: 2009-12-30 06:39 标题: feifei 逻辑121 121. Observatory director: Some say that funding the mega telescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have satisfied their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.
If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the mega telescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?
A. It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the mega telescope.
B. It does not identify those opposed to development of the mega telescope.
C. It launches a personal attack on opponents of the mega telescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.
D. It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual senses of “benefit”.
E. It does not show that the proposed mega telescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.
Answer E
文中推论错在哪里？不太明白E所说的具体例子无可比性的意思。
请哪位给出更详细解释作者: dabiantou 时间: 2009-12-30 10:33
这里的Conclusion用了一个类比, 如果Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein这样的科学家和这些人观点一样狭隘的话,可能世界就享受不到这些发明所带来的便利了.
