标题: 再问OG12-SC-133 [打印本页] 作者: zylrt 时间: 2009-12-8 12:34 标题: 再问OG12-SC-133 133.Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles. (A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect (B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting (C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect (D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting (E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
谢谢NN指点！作者: kray003 时间: 2009-12-8 12:47
saying that their compliance (with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets) is protecting adult sea turtles .... with laws (requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets)作者: zylrt 时间: 2009-12-8 13:02
saying that their compliance (with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets) is protecting adult sea turtles .... with laws (requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets)
-- by 会员 kray003 (2009/12/8 12:47:12)
这个句子结构我理解，不过with是什么作用呢？呵呵作者: zylrt 时间: 2009-12-12 16:30
今天看第二遍，又发现另外一个问题，就是with law requiring和with law to require，B是正确答案，with law requiring是better idiom，查了一些外国的g论坛，除了常用以外，能不能告诉我是为什么？还是不大明白。不定式结构怎么不好？ 谢谢NN解答！！！ 对了，自己顶！！！作者: fehler 时间: 2009-12-13 11:58 标题: laws是compliance with中with的宾语，requiring是修饰laws的分词;is protecting 是compliance的动词 就是说，他们的网对法律做到了compliance，哪个法律呢？要求安装turtle-excluder devices的法律；这个compliance呢，起到了保护作用
with laws requiring不是一个固定结构吧？就是需要考虑requiring和 to require那个修饰laws更准确。