ChaseDream

标题: tt gwd5-39 快考试了，求助！ [打印本页]

作者: zengshiyu 时间: 2009-12-7 11:53
标题: tt gwd5-39 快考试了，求助！
Past assessments of the Brazilian rain forest have used satellite images to tally deforested areas, where farmers and ranchers have clear-cut and burned all the trees, but such work has not addressed either logging, which is the removal of only selected trees, as well as surface fires, burning down individual trees but do not denude the forest.

which is the removal of only selected trees, as well as surface fires, burning
which removes only selected trees, or surface fires that burn
which removes only selected trees, along with surface fires that burn
removing only selected trees, or surface fires, burning
removing only selected trees, as well as surface fires that burn

答案是B。

思路：由either。。。or。。。平行可以排除ACE。但是我选的是D，我觉得，doing比定语从句更好。

哪位NN可否解释一下这个思路有什么错误，为什么选B？

作者: zengshiyu 时间: 2009-12-7 11:56
up。up大家帮个忙吧！
是不是答案错了？

作者: zengshiyu 时间: 2009-12-7 12:01
再顶一下，快来来回复吧！

作者: zengshiyu 时间: 2009-12-7 18:21
顶上去！

作者: Jungle_cheng 时间: 2009-12-7 19:35
以下为我个人挫见：
removing。。。是作为伴随，修饰logging，但句意应该是作为一个解释说明。
该句子得重心是either logging or surface fires ，“removes only selected trees”和“burn down individual trees ”都只是解释这两个名词的，所以使用which和that更好。

作者: zscsl 时间: 2009-12-7 23:31
我觉得吧。。。应该是这样的
看后面。。do not denude the forest.。。前面有个BUT。。并列结构。。表明一定要用burn down....所以只能用从句that...
既然后面用从句了。。前面围了平行结构。。所以也必须用which引导各定语从句。。。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)