Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 Selma Lagerlof was the novelist who became the first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win the Nobel Prize for Literature.
Turning away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 Selma Lagerlof was the novelist who became the first woman and was also the first Swedish writer to win
She turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and novelist Selma Lagerlof in 1909 became the first woman as well as the first Swedish writer that won
Selma Lagerlof was a novelist who turned away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, and in 1909 she became the first woman in addition to the first Swedish writer winning
A novelist who turned away from literary realism to write romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, Selma Lagerlof became in 1909 the first woman and also the first Swedish writer to win
As novelist, Selma Lagerlof turned away from literary realism and wrote romantic stories about the peasant life and landscape of northern Sweden, in 1909 becoming the first woman and also the first Swedish write that won
我选的是A,答案是D
T-4-Q31
As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.
almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide
almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing
expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide
expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide
expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing
Q31:IMO D 这题纠结在B和D，比较一下。expect to do要比expect that it要简洁；B的providing修饰be expected感觉不好，D中to double和to provide并列，能够清清晰表达出句子的意思，production is expected to provide没有理解错误。作者: moonlolita 时间: 2009-11-26 15:45
我知道楼主的意思，就是production增长了这句话的结果该是PROVIDING是把？
但是！原句是production is almost expected that it will double by the end of the year,可不是光说产量增长，而是“人预期产量会增长”，这个是不能伴随provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households这个结果的，人预期不能带来增长结果
D那个PRODUCTION WILL PROVIDE ,这个逻辑好像没什么错，不过我觉得题目做多了以后会和其他题目搞起来，这样就很容易脑子一抽选错了作者: moonlolita 时间: 2009-11-26 15:48
就是如果按照B的理解，那个，PROVIDING这个动作是和expect这个动作一起发生的，是EXPECT的伴随结果，这肯定不对；对比其他的“分词表示一句话带来的影响”的题目，就明白不对了
想了下应该是这样，总算和那道老鹰飞去的题搞清了作者: moonlolita 时间: 2009-11-26 15:50
反过来如果説想用分词来表达那个PRODUCTION发出的动作，那肯定改成和前面那个expect并列动词更好，不会有歧义作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2009-11-26 17:42
double和provide都是结果，所以无法用providing来表示“double的结果”。两者是并列关系。 -------- lz下次发帖注意格式，标题里注明题号，一来后人搜索方便，二来版面清洁，感谢lz的配合！作者: moonlolita 时间: 2009-11-26 17:50
请教斑竹，啥叫“double和provide都是结果，所以无法用providing来表示“double的结果”。两者是并列关系？” 谢谢作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2009-11-26 17:53
umm...double和provide都是at the end of the year时候发生的事情，而present participle在句尾表示了"伴随动作"或者"伴随结果"，而这里，double不是延续性动词，所以无法伴随动作，double和provide同时发生，所以不是伴随结果。两者是并列关系，所以应该用to double ... and to provide ...作者: sayysong 时间: 2009-11-26 18:09
还可以通过almost来区分B和D。 B中 almost expect ... 这里 almost 就成了修饰 expect，“几乎要预计...” D中 expect almost to double ... 这里 almost 才是修饰 double 的，“预计差不多要翻倍...”作者: moonlolita 时间: 2009-11-26 19:01
我想起来了，斑斑好像是在那个贴发掘出过一条定理，说只有延续性动词才有伴随的结果发生，短暂性或者说状态动词不能有伴随结果……thx作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2009-11-27 07:41
额。。其实我不记得有挖掘过了，谢谢提醒。。@@ to #8: 对，almost要修饰行为动词的话会放在行为动词前面，所以这里almost放在expect后面不会引起修饰歧义。作者: edwinwos 时间: 2012-5-17 10:54
额。。其实我不记得有挖掘过了，谢谢提醒。。@@ to #8: 对，almost要修饰行为动词的话会放在行为动词前面，所以这里almost放在expect后面不会引起修饰歧义。
-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2009/11/27 7:41:00)
其实，我看了一些国外网站说的，都说almost expect的语序有问题，说 "production is expected almost" is the correct order of words