ChaseDream

标题: prep2-110 [打印本页]

作者: cyang16    时间: 2009-11-24 23:50
标题: prep2-110
The ivory-billed woodpecker, once the largest woodpecker in North America at a striking 20 inches tall, has moved in and out of the extinct category, with scientists consistently unable to find solid proof for the bird to still exist.    

(A) for the bird to still exist
(B) for the bird as still existing
(C) for the bird's continued existence
(D) that the bird still exists
(E) of the bird and its continued existence

答案是D,我想问下A为什么不对,proof for没错啊,就是因为这个排除D E.没想到答案是D.  讲解里说A是proof习语用法错误??
作者: zanyingsan    时间: 2009-11-25 00:04
这里的proof是做证据讲,后面需要跟的是证据的具体内容,在这种情况下,需要用that做定语从句来引导,所以for并不好。
作者: cyang16    时间: 2009-11-25 00:07
这里的proof是做证据讲,后面需要跟的是证据的具体内容,在这种情况下,需要用that做定语从句来引导,所以for并不好。
-- by 会员 zanyingsan (2009/11/25 0:04:35)



是不是A中的不定式有问题,做题的时候就感觉A中的不定式好像读不通,但是和BC比就相对较好,所以选了。
作者: zanyingsan    时间: 2009-11-25 00:24
不是为了找证据使得鸟还存在,而是证明鸟还存在。
作者: singletonboy    时间: 2009-11-25 11:07
同意zanyingsan, for bird to live仔细读一下便会理会了,不是找证据“为了”让鸟“还存在下去”




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3