ChaseDream

标题: [求助]大全536 [打印本页]

作者: freedownload 时间: 2004-3-19 10:02
标题: [求助]大全536

1. None of the attempts to specify the causes of crime explains why most of the people exposed to the alleged causes do not commit crimes and, conversely, why so many of those not so exposed have.

(A) have

(B) has

(D) do（D）

(E) could

不懂这道题考什么语法点，是什么语法现象，请解释，谢谢！

作者: maotian 时间: 2004-3-19 10:28
according“and,conversely", we can find that the clause“why most of the people exposed to the alleged causes do not commit crimes" and the clause“why so many of those not so exposed——”should be parallel.

so we choose D: do, which refers to "commit crimes".

作者: roric 时间: 2006-8-31 21:20

请问：None of the attempts （to specify the causes of crime ）explains why most of the people exposed to the alleged causes do not commit crimes and, conversely, why so many of those not so exposed have.

to do 短语修饰attempts，None of the attempts 的中心词是none，为什么后面的explain用单数？在google上查出一句Maybe none of them are terrorists.....是用的复数阿

作者: roric 时间: 2006-9-1 11:28

明白了，太白吃了

作者: anzhang6815 时间: 2009-3-26 20:31

弱弱的问一下，这句话的中文意思是什么

作者: misslp 时间: 2009-3-26 23:05
没有哪一个判定犯罪诱因的尝试可以解释为什么绝大多数接触到所谓的犯罪诱因的人没有犯罪,相反却有那么多没有接触到的人犯罪了.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)