ffice" />1. In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers
请问这题是根据句子含义来判断的吗？
还有其他语法点吗？
先谢谢了～～～
ffice" />B it指代cars,数不一致,错
C 名词+having been done/ having done修饰, 错
当然, 主要应考虑逻辑意思,这才是GMAT语法的核心
pay +钱+for sth: 买东西化了多少钱
pay+钱+for doing sth: 化多少钱为自己的...行为付出代价
ffice" />B it指代cars,数不一致,错
C 名词+having been done/ having done修饰, 错
当然, 主要应考虑逻辑意思,这才是GMAT语法的核心
pay +钱+for sth: 买东西化了多少钱
pay+钱+for doing sth: 化多少钱为自己的...行为付出代价
B it指代cars,数不一致,错
C 名词+having been done/ having done修饰, 错 （这个说法有依据吗？为什么错呢？）
当然, 主要应考虑逻辑意思,这才是GMAT语法的核心
pay +钱+for sth: 买东西化了多少钱
pay+钱+for doing sth: 化多少钱为自己的...行为付出代价
看了这一题所有的讨论贴，不明白的如下，
1 句意：在1987.12 一家汽车制造厂请求"庭外和解"对于里程计的控诉并同意支付由于制造里程计没有联接的试驾车 超过16000000的损失赔偿
看不懂，好几种翻译都不同，怎么办呢？？？请NN看看，
2 这句话的意思是对修改里程表这件事做出赔偿，
test-driven adj.
如果理解为对cars的赔偿，(a)中应该为test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected比较简洁，且damage to something的搭配比较合理；(b)(c)中的it, 不合理；(e)中have表示主动拥有cars, (d)中的固定搭配have something done, 合理
请问这个test-driven是动词还是名词，因为看到有贴说是have done sth 是have sth done的倒装，
3 pleaed no test to criminal charges of odometer tapering 承认自己的对里程表做手脚违法行为
cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected 试开的车其里程表没接线，这样即使试开的车被是开了很久，由于里程表不仍显示很低的里程数，仍可卖好价钱
看了这个有点明白，但还是不完全明白。
NN们来啊，这题我完全昏头了，
谢谢
UP
B it指代cars,数不一致,错
C 名词+having been done/ having done修饰, 错
当然, 主要应考虑逻辑意思,这才是GMAT语法的核心
pay +钱+for sth: 买东西化了多少钱
pay+钱+for doing sth: 化多少钱为自己的...行为付出代价
他讲的很清楚了...
看了这一题所有的讨论贴，不明白的如下，
1 句意：在1987.12 一家汽车制造厂请求"庭外和解"对于里程计的控诉并同意支付由于制造里程计没有联接的试驾车 超过16000000的损失赔偿
看不懂，好几种翻译都不同，怎么办呢？？？请NN看看，
在1987.12，一个汽车制造业者对诉讼的指控没有提出异议，而且同意为civil damages for cars支付超过$xxx的钱,而这些cars是test-driven with their odometers disconnected
2 这句话的意思是对修改里
程表这件事做出赔偿，
test-driven adj.
如果理解为对cars的赔偿，(a)中应该为test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected比较简洁，且damage to something的搭配比较合理；(b)(c)中的it, 不合理；(e)中have表示主动拥有cars, (d)中的固定搭配have something done, 合理
请问这个test-driven是动词还是名词，因为看到有贴说是have done sth 是have sth done的倒装，
觉得是名词,不确定
3 pleaed no test to criminal charges of odometer tapering 承认自己的对里程表做手脚违法行为
cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected 试开的车其里程表没接线，这样即使试开的车被是开了很久，由于里程表不仍显示很低的里程数，仍可卖好价钱
看了这个有点明白，但还是不完全明白。
NN们来啊，这题我完全昏头了，
谢谢
认罪的原因是一件事情而不是车子，所以， a b 直接去掉
c, 时态不对
e, d 语法都是对的， 但是e 啰嗦
注：啰嗦不是错，只有同时出现不啰嗦的时候才是
1. In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers
今天又看了一下这一题，问题都明白了，除了这个having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected 的结构，
前人说过：：(d)中的固定搭配have something done, 合理
请问这个test-driven是动词还是名词，因为看到有贴说是have done sth 是have sth done的倒装，
我怎么现在觉得having是实意动词“有”的意思，有被测试过的汽车having test-driven cars，后面的with their adometer disconnected作定语修饰cars
请问这个应该怎么理解呢？？
继续求教。谢谢。
我觉得把D的having test-driven car解释成have sth. done的倒装有点牵强。介词后面没有规定说要倒装吧？
其实最简单的解释往往是最有效的：
for在这里是介词表原因，引导谓宾短语。不考虑时态的话，原始的状态就是for test-driving cars with...
这里test-drive的动作发生在过去的某个不确切的时间，符合完成时的用法。所以就变成for having test driven:have+ 动词的过去分词构成完成时。
类似的完成时用法有：I have been to NewYork.表示我曾经去过NY，但是究竟是什么时候，不清楚。
关于完成时的用法你可以参考一下下面的链接：
http://www.usingenglish.com/glossary/present-perfect.html
我觉得把D的having test-driven car解释成have sth. done的倒装有点牵强。介词后面没有规定说要倒装吧？
其实最简单的解释往往是最有效的：
for在这里是介词表原因，引导谓宾短语。不考虑时态的话，原始的状态就是for test-driving cars with...
这里test-drive的动作发生在过去的某个不确切的时间，符合完成时的用法。所以就变成for having test driven:have+ 动词的过去分词构成完成时。
类似的完成时用法有：I have been to NewYork.表示我曾经去过NY，但是究竟是什么时候，不清楚。
关于完成时的用法你可以参考一下下面的链接：
我倒是支持 have sth done的倒装，因为这里的sth是 cars with their odometers disconnected，但是这个短语比较长，所以把done即test-driven提到前面来了
with的独立主格结构怎么排除的BCE?
B it指代cars,数不一致,错
C 名词+having been done/ having done修饰, 错
当然, 主要应考虑逻辑意思,这才是GMAT语法的核心
pay +钱+for sth: 买东西化了多少钱
pay+钱+for doing sth: 化多少钱为自己的...行为付出代价
it 指manufacturer不行么？
cars that it had test driven 定语从句修饰cars。即为 manufacturer had test-driven cars.
不认同斑竹该项说法。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |